Epstein Secrets

simply subjects the defendant to a more severe penalty in light of Congress' concern about the sexual exploitation of minors. Cf. United States v. Figueroa , 165 F.3d 111, 115 (2d Cir. 1998) (noting that, if a criminal statute's language is unclear, its scienter requirement is presumed to be met once an

gust 6, 2004, Defendants EPSTEIN and traveled from the U.S. Virgin Islands to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft ownec ndant JEGE, INC. #. On August 19, 2004, Defendants EPSTEIN and traveled from Van Nuys, California to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned

for Jeff. The victim agreed and arrangements were made to.1 the victim to Epstein's house on a weekend. stated that she and (Later identified as Figueroa) picked up the victim at the victim's house. They traveled to E ns House and entered through the kitchen door. They met with the house chef and Eps

show transfers of large sums of money (as much as $250,000 on a single day) from one personal Epstein account into an account purportedly owned by JEGE, Inc. (an entity created for the sole purpose of holding Epstein's personal Boeing 727 aircraft), and then to another personal Epstein account. It is bel

simply subjects the defendant to a more severe penalty in light of Congress' concern about the sexual exploitation of minors. Cf. United States v. Figueroa , 165 F.3d 111, 115 (2d Cir. 1998) (noting that, if a criminal statute's language is unclear, its scienter requirement is presumed to be met once an

the indictment has been revised to group the overt acts related to each Jane Doe. BEach of the airplanes is held in a separate "shell corporation," JEGE, Inc., and Hyperion Air, Inc. Epstein is the sole shareholder in both of these corporations and they serve no purpose other than to hold and maintain the

simply subjects the defendant to a more severe penalty in light of Congress' concern about the sexual exploitation of minors. Cf. United States v. Figueroa , 165 F.3d 111, 115 (2d Cir. 1998) (noting that, if a criminal statute's language is unclear, its scienter requirement is presumed to be met once an

ach County, Florida aboard the Boeing 757 aircraft owned by Defendant JEGE, INC. fiEach of the airplanes is held in a separate "shell corporation," JEGE, Inc., and Hyperion Air, Inc. Epstein is the shareholder in both of these corporations and they serve no purpose other than to hold and maintain the airp