Epstein Secrets

lows for the discovery sought in Sections II. a-g above and in Defendant's Motion to Identify. See also Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 26; Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340, 352 (1978); Dunbar v. U.S., 502 F.2d 206 (5th Cir. 1974); Rossbach v. Rundle, 128 F.Supp.2d 1348, 1354 (S.D. Fla. 200); Fed.R.Civ.Pr

Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 305-931-2200 Brad Edwards, Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: 954-522-3456 Fax: 954-527-8663 [email protected] Fax: 305-931-0877

may be in the case.” Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340, 352 (1978). The correspondence w

Edwards Bradley J. Edwards ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER Las Olas City Centre 401 East Las Olas Blvd., S

la. 1966). It is not enough for the opposing party merely to assert that an issue of fact does exist. Fisel v. Wynns, 667 So.2d 761, 764 (Fla.1996); Landers v. Milton, 370 So.2d 368, 370 (F1a.1979) (same). Moreover, it is well-recognized that the non-moving party faced with a summary judgment motion su

Epstein was defrauded by Edwards, acting in concert with (a minor female who was sexually abused by Epstein) and Scott Rothstein (President of the Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler law firm ("RRA") where Edwards worked for a short period of time). Epstein appears to allege that Edwards joined and Rothstein in fabricating sexu

So.2d 404 (Fla.1991) (Father prosecuted for crime of video recording of minor daughter in violation of statute concerning depiction of sex acts); Sanders State, 568 So.2d 1014 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (Father prosec- uted for lewd and lascivious acts against minor daughter). FN6. See, e.g., Zordan I Pag

ndant ROBERT CRITTON, JR., ESQUIRE Burman, Critton, et al. On behalf of Third Party E.W. WILLIAM J. BERGER, ESQUIRE BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQUIRE Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler On behalf of Third Party, The Post DEANNA SHULLMAN, ESQUIRE Thomas, LoCiero & Bralow, PL EFTA00233747 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

n. 16, 1990. Defendant who allegedly breached nonprosecu- lion agreement moved to dismiss indictment or to suppress statements. The District Court, Sanders, Chief Judge, held that: (I) defendant, who refused to cooperate by failing to meet with Government representatives, failing to testify before gra

. Willits, P.A. 2290 10ib Avenue North Suite 404 Lake Worth. FL 33461 Fax: Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 80811 Brad Edwards, Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1650 Fort Laud rdal F1.33301 Phon • Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq.