Epstein Secrets

themselves. OOK Ok Even before word of the June 2016 meeting leaked out, Kushner’s legal team—largely assembled in a rush since the appointment of Mueller, the special counsel—had been piecing together a forensic picture of both the campaign’s Russian contacts and Kushner Companies’ finances and money t

“tough guy” lawyers. Beyond Donald Trump’s own daily antics, here was the consuming issue of the White House: the ongoing investigation directed by Robert Mueller. The father, the daughter, the son-in-law, his father, the extended family exposure, the prosecutor, the retainers looking to save their own skins, t

president: so now, not only did they brand McMaster as weak on Israel, they persuaded Sheldon Adelson to lobby Trump—Bannon, HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020102 Adelson told the president, was the only person he trusted on Israel in the White House. Adelson’s billions and implacability always impressed Trump, and his

405(b), SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00794625 71 H3V0GIU1 1 so let meet respond to that overview. 2 They reference Mueller and Kirkpatrick, a treatise 3 that we think is very instructive on this particular point. 4 Mueller and Kirkpatrick says, "It is true that in a

ork street 20 that, "I am referring to the statement that we made." As we 21 set forth in our summary judgment brief, this Court's ruling in 22 Adelson v. Harris is directly on point, that a mere reference 23 to another writing that contains defamatory statements does not 24 constitute an actiona

3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 H3V0GIU1 -1 so let meet respond to that overview. They reference Mueller and Kirkpatrick, a treatise that we think is very instructive on this particular point. Mueller and Kirkpatrick says, "It is true that in a defama

t on a New York street that, "I am referring to the statement that we made." As we set forth in our summary judgment brief, this Court's ruling in Adelson v. Harris is directly on point, that a mere reference to another writing that contains defamatory statements does not constitute an actionable repe

is staff’s ties to Russia. If Michael Flynn had recently become the most powerful man in Washington for what he might reveal about the president, now Mueller arguably assumed that position because he had the power to make Flynn, and all other assorted Trump cronies and flunkies, squeal. Rosenstein, of cou

Adelson, titan of Las Vegas, big-check right-wing contributor, and, in the president’s mind, quite the toughest tough-guy Jew (that is, the richest). Adelson regularly disparaged Kushner’s motives and abilities. The president, to Bannon’s great satisfaction, kept telling his son-in-law, as he strategized o

IGHT_011373 10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 23 24 25 val H3VOGIU1 so let meet respond to that overview. They reference Mueller and Kirkpatrick, a treatise that we think is very instructive on this particular point. Mueller and Kirkpatrick says, "It is true that ina defamat

t on a New York street that, "I am referring to the statement that we made." As we set forth in our summary judgment brief, this Court's ruling in Adelson v. Harris is directly on point, that a mere reference to another writing that contains defamatory statements does not constitute an actionable repe