Epstein Secrets

e Jane Doe 102 complaint. Paragraph 29 of 13 that complaint references this specific letter, and of course 14 that complaint is referenced in the Churcher articles, which is 15 referenced by Ms. Maxwell's first public statement about 16 Ms. in 2011. So almost like a Russian nesting doll, 17 all t

right? 10 MS. SCHULTZ: I'm sorry. I apologize, your Honor. I 11 don't think I follow your question. I think that Ms. Maxwell 12 knew about the Churcher article, which told her about the 13 litigation against Epstein. 14 THE COURT: It told her there was a complaint. 15 MS. SCHULTZ: Your Honor, t

iff who publicized to the entire world the fact that she 5 says she was sexually trafficked prior to Epstein and Maxwell. 6 She put that into her Sharon Churcher story. She got paid for 7 that story. And so one of the issues in our case are her 8 damages to her reputation. And if she's the one who was 9

tiff's counsel handed you a book that had the Sharon 6 Churcher articles in and they argued to you, hey, that Jane Doe 7 102 is mentioned in that Sharon Churcher article and therefore, 8 Ms. Maxwell's denial about that statement somehow related to 9 the Jane Doe 102? Do you remember that argument? That's t

e evidence 23 that goes directly to proving the allegations that we've been 24 talking about today. For example, we're going to produce Tony 25 Figueroa, who's going to say that Epstein's assistants SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00794483 (212) 805-0300 EFTA00794484 60 H3ulgiva 1 regu

There were no allegations prior to this time of misbehavior by Ms. Maxwell. MS. MENNINGER: That's untrue, your Honor. Plaintiff sold her story to Sharon Churcher. When she sold her story to SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00592412 45 H3ulgiva Sharon Churcher, she made some allegations against Ms. M

how to be a masseuse. That's what she said in the Sharon Churcher published articles. THE COURT: And that's the only reference to Maxwell in the Churcher articles. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00592413 46 H3ulgiva MS. MENNINGER: In the first Churcher article. But 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1

in the first statement. So this book contains the universe of statements -- THE COURT: Yes, I understand that obviously she was responding to this Churcher article, but there's nothing to me that indicates that she was responding to the Epstein complaint. MR. EDWARDS: Well, she's responding to what sh

plaintiff's counsel handed you a book that had the Sharon Churcher articles in and they argued to you, hey, that Jane Doe 102 is mentioned in that Sharon Churcher article and therefore, Ms. Maxwell's denial about that statement somehow related to the Jane Doe 102? Do you remember that argument? That's the sa

strich's case, as her fiancé; in Tony Figueroa's case, as her boyfriend. We would ask that the evidence related to the Eppinger materials, Ostrich, Figueroa, and these two police incidents, be admitted at trial. THE COURT: As to Ostrich, did I understand correctly that what you want to present there is

d some of that abuse did occur when she was 14 a minor. 15 THE COURT: Yes. Well, okay. But there are other 16 things that she sets forth in the Churcher articles, in the 17 motion to intervene, there are a whole series of other things 18 that are -- I mean, there are things that have been said, an

ment made? 19 MS. McCAWLEY: The statement was made in a March 5th 20 article. So not the two articles we showed you yesterday 21 THE COURT: The Churcher article. 22 MS. McCAWLEY: Yes. But it was another article that 23 came out in March of 2011. 24 And the statement was with respect to my client

by -- SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00794599 45 H3VOGIU1 1 2 3 4 5 Ms. THE COURT: I've read it. MS. MENNINGER: -- Sharon Churcher. THE COURT: Yes, I've read it. MS. MENNINGER: Okay. It's the one in which on March 5th, 2011, gave a long and lengthy 6 interview to Sharon Chur

which only 3 further substantiates Ms. testimony that at one point 4 she attempted to get away from defendant's abuse, along with -- 5 and Mr. Figueroa testified to the same. 6 So again, I would also reiterate that her reputation 7 as a child for being a truant or a runaway is not what is at 8

at abuse, and some of that abuse did occur when she was a minor. THE COURT: Yes. Well, okay. But there are other things that she sets forth in the Churcher articles, in the motion to intervene, there are a whole series of other things that are -- I mean, there are things that have been said, and my re

the statement made? MS. McCAWLEY: The statement was made in a March 5th article. So not the two articles we showed you yesterday -- THE COURT: The Churcher article. MS. McCAWLEY: Yes. But it was another article that came out in March of 2011. And the statement was with respect to my client saying she

th, 2002, which only further substantiates Ms. testimony that at one point she attempted to get away from defendant's abuse, along with -- and Mr. Figueroa testified to the same. So again, I would also reiterate that her reputation as a child for being a truant or a runaway is not what is at issue in

statement made? MS. McCAWLEY: The statement was made in a March 5th article. So not the two articles we showed you yesterday -- THI Gl COURT: The Churcher article. MS. McCAWLEY: Yes. But it was another article that came out in March of 2011. And the statement was with respect to my client saying she

hat abuse, and some of that abuse did occur when she was a minor. THE COURT: Yes. Well, okay. But there are other things that she sets forth in the Churcher articles, in the motion to intervene, there are a whole series of other things that are -- I mean, there are things that have been said, and my re

which only further substantiates Ms. Giuffre's testimony that at one point she attempted to get away from defendant's abuse, along with -- and Mr. Figueroa testified to the same. So again, I would also reiterate that her reputation as a child for being a truant or a runaway is not what is at issue in t