Epstein Secrets

est is that today -- and today ends, for our joint effort, at 3:30 -- the defendant's motion with respect to the supplemental reports of Jansen and Kliman; the 302 motion; and there are three that seem to me to go together -- the references to the Florida action, the CVRA action; the Epstein plea agr

20 21 22 23 24 25 his that -- THE COURT: That's a whole different issue. Right? MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes. I agree. And finally, your Honor, on this Kliman issue, it seems to me that all of this is -- well, let me back up. Here are the reasons why it's prejudicial, and I don't think we can just say, t

REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00592376 H3ulgiva 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 presentation in front of Kliman that he gets to then comment on. And so really what we're doing is we're trying to clean up the in-court testimony by an out-of-court statement to

22 23 24 25 problem. Well, no, it isn't. No, it isn't. Okay. So let's do 675. MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I will say that it is my reading of Rule 412 that any hearing that is based upon in part Rule 412 is supposed to be conducted in a in camera setting. MS. SCHULTZ: Counsel for Ms. has no objec

e Court on July 2, 2009. Additionally, Plaintiffs have provided Defendant with extensive discovery from Plaintiff's forensic psychiatric expert, Dr. Kliman, including videotaped interviews of Plaintiffs, which have been provided to and used by the Defendant's expert, Richard C.W. Hall, M.D.2 Defendant

9-KAM Document 266 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2009 Page 7 of 9 history, thereby evading the limitations on discovery and admissibility found in Rule 412 for the only conceivable purpose of harassing the Plaintiff. Defendant asserts that he seeks to use investigators to ask ex-boyfriends and friends

t, his arrest, neither of which mentioned plaintiff, 8 by the way, but they took those materials and gave them to 9 their psychiatric expert, Dr. Kliman, who made the video we 10 talked about earlier. Dr. Kliman also administered a number of 11 tests to plaintiffs to figure out whether she had any

same 2 problem. Well, no, it isn't. No, it isn't. 3 Okay. So let's do 675. 4 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I will say that it is my 5 reading of Rule 412 that any hearing that is based upon in part 6 Rule 412 is supposed to be conducted in a in camera setting. 7 MS. SCHULTZ: Counsel for Ms. has no