Epstein Secrets

timony of both Dr. Kliman and Professor Coonan prohibiting from providing their credibility and vouching opinions. This is the subject matter of Dr. Esplin's rebuttal report which explains that there is no reliable or scientific methodology by which an expert could reliably come to such opinions. Of co

w information Plaintiff may present in her case-in-chief. Ms. Maxwell has filed well-founded motions in limine to exclude the testimony of both Dr. Kliman and Professor Coonan prohibiting from providing their credibility and vouching opinions. This is the subject matter of Dr. Esplin's rebuttal report

our Honor. The defendant's own expert report 3 described our client as a prostitute. Your Honor has under 4 advisement the expert report from Dr. Esplin, and so I deposed 5 Dr. Esplin, and I said, "Are you sure that's an accurate term 6 in the context of this case? Because we have a child who 7

4 THE COURT: And why do you have it in your expert's 15 report? 16 MS. SCHULTZ: Well, our expert is -- I'm assuming 17 you're referring to Dr. Kliman, who is a physician. He's a 18 medical doctor. He took a full -- 19 THE COURT: There's a whole thing about it. Are you 20 going to withdraw the

No, your Honor. The defendant's own expert report described our client as a prostitute. Your Honor has under advisement the expert report from Dr. Esplin, and so I deposed Dr. Esplin, and I said, "Are you sure that's an accurate term in the context of this case? Because we have a child who cannot co

2 23 24 25 THE COURT: And why do you have it in your expert's report? MS. SCHULTZ: Well, our expert is -- I'm assuming you're referring to Dr. Kliman, who is a physician. He's a medical doctor. He took a full -- THE COURT: There's a whole thing about it. Are you going to withdraw the -- MS. SCHUL

pen? No, your Honor. The defendant's own expert report described our client as a prostitute. Your Honor has under advisement th xpert report from Dr. Esplin, and so I deposed Dr. Esplin, and I said, "Are you sure that's an accurate term in the context of this case? Because we have a child who cannot co

reexisting. = THE COURT: And why do you have it in your expert's report? MS. SCHULTZ: Well, our expert is -- I'm assuming you're referring to Dr. Kliman, who is a physician. He's a medical doctor. He took a full -- THE COURT: There's a whole thing about it. Are you going to withdraw the -- MS. SCHUL