ehavior, and prevention/treatment programs. Trauma, Violence & Abuse 11(4): 159 177. DOI: 10.1177/1524838010378299 Lamb ME, Orbach Y, Sternberg KJ, Esplin PW, Ilershkowitz I. 2002.The effects of forensic interview practices on the quality of information provided by alleged victims of child abuse. In C

timony of both Dr. Kliman and Professor Coonan prohibiting from providing their credibility and vouching opinions. This is the subject matter of Dr. Esplin's rebuttal report which explains that there is no reliable or scientific methodology by which an expert could reliably come to such opinions. Of co

our Honor. The defendant's own expert report 3 described our client as a prostitute. Your Honor has under 4 advisement the expert report from Dr. Esplin, and so I deposed 5 Dr. Esplin, and I said, "Are you sure that's an accurate term 6 in the context of this case? Because we have a child who 7

pen? No, your Honor. The defendant's own expert report described our client as a prostitute. Your Honor has under advisement th xpert report from Dr. Esplin, and so I deposed Dr. Esplin, and I said, "Are you sure that's an accurate term in the context of this case? Because we have a child who cannot co

No, your Honor. The defendant's own expert report described our client as a prostitute. Your Honor has under advisement the expert report from Dr. Esplin, and so I deposed Dr. Esplin, and I said, "Are you sure that's an accurate term in the context of this case? Because we have a child who cannot co