Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See e.g. Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court can, absent
the procedures designated therein would not apply since Judge Pucillo filed and sealed the documents sua sponte, not by motion. To the extent that the Administrative Order conflicts with the version of rule 2.420 then in effect, the rule prevails. Judge Pucillo was not required to follow Administrative Order 2.032 when
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See e.g. Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court can, absent
the procedures designated therein would not apply since Judge Pucillo filed and sealed the documents sua sponte, not by motion. To the extent that the Administrative Order conflicts with the version of rule 2.420 then in effect, the rule prevails. Judge Pucillo was not required to follow Administrative Order 2.032 when
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See e.g. Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court can, absent
the procedures designated therein would not apply since Judge Pucillo filed and sealed the documents sua sponte, not by motion. To the extent that the Administrative Order conflicts with the version of rule 2.420 then in effect, the rule prevails. Judge Pucillo was not required to follow Administrative Order 2.032 when
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See e.g. Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court can, absent
the procedures designated therein would not apply since Judge Pucillo filed and sealed the documents sua sponte, not by motion. To the extent that the Administrative Order conflicts with the version of rule 2.420 then in effect, the rule prevails. Judge Pucillo was not required to follow Administrative Order 2.032 when
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (110)
Entities connected to both Michael Douglas and the Administrative Order
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON885 w/ Michael·5 w/ the
George W. Bush
PERSON419 w/ Michael·4 w/ the
United States
LOCATION238 w/ Michael·4 w/ the
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON224 w/ Michael·3 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON170 w/ Michael·3 w/ the
Bradley Edwards
PERSON105 w/ Michael·4 w/ the
Harvey Weinstein
PERSON95 w/ Michael·3 w/ the
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON90 w/ Michael·5 w/ the
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON90 w/ Michael·5 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION86 w/ Michael·3 w/ the
Kenneth Marra
PERSON83 w/ Michael·4 w/ the
James Baker
PERSON81 w/ Michael·3 w/ the
Alexander Acosta
PERSON79 w/ Michael·3 w/ the
FedEx
ORGANIZATION59 w/ Michael·4 w/ the
West Palm Beach
LOCATION55 w/ Michael·3 w/ the
Douglas Oil Co.
ORGANIZATION45 w/ Michael·4 w/ the
Palm Beach County
LOCATION43 w/ Michael·3 w/ the
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION42 w/ Michael·4 w/ the
Paul Cassell
PERSON44 w/ Michael·2 w/ the
RC
Robert D. Critton
PERSON41 w/ Michael·4 w/ the