Epstein Secrets

lack or poor. See F'urman Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726, L.Ed.2d 346 (1972), reh. denied,409 U.S. 902, 93 S.Ct. 89, 34 L.Ed.2d 163 (1972) (Douglas, J., concurring) (in which the Su- preme Court chronicled our history of ra- cial and economic disparity in the execu- tion of accused persons). Cri

s that apply to pro- tect a defendant at the trial stage also apply at the appellate level, provided the appeal is a matter of right. FN2. Justice Rehnquist, writing in dissent, vehemently objected to this characterization as "inconsistent with the general view of state app late review expressed ...

te criminal prosecutions, the rule is stated in Douglas v. City of Jeannette, 819 U.S. 167, 163-164, 63

insu- lar and discrete' minorities at every turn in the road." Sugarman v. nougat:, 113 U.S. 634, 657, 93 S.Ct. 2842, 2865, 37 L.Ed.2d 853 (1973) (Rehnquist, .1., dissent- ing). We therefore decline to equate one's choice of language with one's race or na- tional origin, classification on the basis of w

ustice White filed an opinion con- curring in the judgment and in parts of the court's opinion, in which Mr. Justice Rehnquist joined. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the decision of the case. West Headnotes 111 Criminal Law 110 C=1028 110 Criminal Law 110XXIV Review 110XXIV(E) Presentation an

preclusion sanction did not deprive defend- ant of rights to compulsory process and cross-examination. Page 1 Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Rehnquist joined in parts of the court's opinion. Opinion following reversal, 522 F.2d 1274. Mr. Justice White filed an opinion con- curring in the judgmen