Back to Network
5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
Document Mentions (5 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
on. Salameh, 152 F.3d at 113 (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238- 39 (1983)). Judge McMahon fou
d Franks past its precise factual context to a motion to suppress based on alleged misrepresentations in a wiretap application. See United States v. Rajaratnam, 719 F.3d 139, 151 (2d Cir. 2013). The Court concludes that Maxwell must at least meet this standard for a similar claim invoking the Court's inher
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
on. Salameh, 152 F.3d at 113 (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238- 39 (1983)). Judge McMahon fou
d Franks past its precise factual context to a motion to suppress based on alleged misrepresentations in a wiretap application. See United States v. Rajaratnam, 719 F.3d 139, 151 (2d Cir. 2013). The Court concludes that Maxwell must at least meet this standard for a similar claim invoking the Court's inher
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
on. Salameh, 152 F.3d at 113 (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238- 39 (1983)). Judge McMahon fou
d Franks past its precise factual context to a motion to suppress based on alleged misrepresentations in a wiretap application. See United States v. Rajaratnam, 719 F.3d 139, 151 (2d Cir. 2013). The Court concludes that Maxwell must at least meet this standard for a similar claim invoking the Court's inher
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
on. Salameh, 152 F.3d at 113 (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238- 39 (1983)). Judge McMahon fou
d Franks past its precise factual context to a motion to suppress based on alleged misrepresentations in a wiretap application. See United States v. Rajaratnam, 719 F.3d 139, 151 (2d Cir. 2013). The Court concludes that Maxwell must at least meet this standard for a similar claim invoking the Court's inher
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
on. Salameh, 152 F.3d at 113 (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238- 39 (1983)). Judge McMahon fou
d Franks past its precise factual context to a motion to suppress based on alleged misrepresentations in a wiretap application. See United States v. Rajaratnam, 719 F.3d 139, 151 (2d Cir. 2013). The Court concludes that Maxwell must at least meet this standard for a similar claim invoking the Court's inher
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (49)
Entities connected to both Robert Gates and Rajaratnam
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON1,667 w/ Robert·9 w/ Rajaratnam
Michael Cohen
PERSON244 w/ Robert·2 w/ Rajaratnam
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON203 w/ Robert·8 w/ Rajaratnam
Julie K. Brown
PERSON183 w/ Robert·10 w/ Rajaratnam
Prince Charles
PERSON165 w/ Robert·2 w/ Rajaratnam
Samantha Power
PERSON157 w/ Robert·2 w/ Rajaratnam
Stephen Hawking
PERSON135 w/ Robert·2 w/ Rajaratnam
United States
LOCATION116 w/ Robert·9 w/ Rajaratnam
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON121 w/ Robert·3 w/ Rajaratnam
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION72 w/ Robert·5 w/ Rajaratnam
the Southern District
LOCATION71 w/ Robert·6 w/ Rajaratnam
David Boies
PERSON46 w/ Robert·7 w/ Rajaratnam
Eric Schmidt
PERSON45 w/ Robert·5 w/ Rajaratnam
Cynthia Nixon
PERSON34 w/ Robert·2 w/ Rajaratnam
Commonwealth
ORGANIZATION33 w/ Robert·2 w/ Rajaratnam
FI
Fisher
PERSON22 w/ Robert·5 w/ Rajaratnam
Carpenter
PERSON17 w/ Robert·5 w/ Rajaratnam
Second Circuit
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Robert·8 w/ Rajaratnam
CM
Colleen McMahon
PERSON7 w/ Robert·7 w/ Rajaratnam
Boies Schiller
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Robert·6 w/ Rajaratnam