Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
oral redemption request was in oct, and the written reduced demand on NOV. 13,schulte had a meeting in sept in which glenn attended, that informed Zwirn and Glenn of the problem in detail. ( wendall knows thisly I am aware of the issue being legal vs moral duty. However , the legal is abundantly clea
gal is abundantly clear once all the documents are reviewed, as opposed to only what wendalll has. I expressed in no uncertain terms in talking with Condren that I view this as a dispute ( Me vs JPM , in the Bear STearns case) as a family disagreement,. hopefully not discounted , by my well stated desire
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
oral redemption request was in oct, and the written reduced demand on NOV. 13,schulte had a meeting in sept in which glenn attended, that informed Zwirn and Glenn of the problem in detail. ( wendall knows this!y I am aware of the issue being legal vs moral duty. However , the legal is abundantly clea
gal is abundantly clear once all the documents are reviewed, as opposed to only what wendalll has. I expressed in no uncertain terms in talking with Condren that I view this as a dispute ( Me vs JPM , in the Bear STearns case) as a family disagreement,. hopefully not discounted , by my well stated desire
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
oral redemption request was in act, and the written reduced demand on NOV. 13,schulte had a meeting in sept in which glenn attended, that informed Zwirn and Glenn of the problem in detail. ( wendall knows this!)/ I am aware of the issue being legal vs moral duty. However , the legal is abundantly cle
gal is abundantly clear once all the documents are reviewed, as opposed to only what wendalll has. I expressed in no uncertain terms in talking with Condren that I view this as a dispute ( Me vs JPM , in the Bear STearns case) as a family disagreement,. hopefully not discounted , by my well stated desire
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
oral redemption request was in oct, and the written reduced demand on NOV. 13,schulte had a meeting in sept in which glenn attended, that informed Zwirn and Glenn of the problem in detail. ( wendall knows this!)/ I am aware of the issue being legal vs moral duty. However , the legal is abundantly cle
gal is abundantly clear once all the documents are reviewed, as opposed to only what wendalll has. I expressed in no uncertain terms in talking with Condren that I view this as a dispute ( Me vs JPM , in the Bear STearns case) as a family disagreement,. hopefully not discounted , by my well stated desire
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (12)
Entities connected to both Zwirn and Condren
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON95 w/ Zwirn·39 w/ Condren
Highbridge
ORGANIZATION27 w/ Zwirn·8 w/ Condren
DI
Darren Indyke
PERSON15 w/ Zwirn·18 w/ Condren
Lesley Groff
PERSON12 w/ Zwirn·20 w/ Condren
Jes Staley
PERSON14 w/ Zwirn·10 w/ Condren
Wendall
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Zwirn·8 w/ Condren
Bear Stearns
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Zwirn·8 w/ Condren
SU
Sussman
PERSON4 w/ Zwirn·5 w/ Condren
Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Zwirn·4 w/ Condren
SH
Shenker
PERSON3 w/ Zwirn·3 w/ Condren
SW
Swieca
PERSON4 w/ Zwirn·2 w/ Condren
ER
Erdoes
PERSON2 w/ Zwirn·2 w/ Condren