Epstein Secrets

EN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor New York, NY 10011 Attorneys for Ghislaine Ma

ernment offers only one argument for why it should be permitted to prosecute Ms. Maxwell for these offenses. Relying on the Court's prior ruling and the Second Circuit's decision in United States v. Annabi, 771 F.2d 670 (2d Cir. 1985) (per curiam), the government asserts that the NPA does not bind the U.S. Attorney'

States District Court Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.0 Jeffrey S. PagRoca Denver, Colorado 80203 wv.rw.nmnaw.com Re: United States v. Ghisiaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Response to Dkt. No. 227, Government's April 21.2021 Lett

. at I. That's because Ms. Maxwell's motions to suppress allege violations of the due process clause, the Fourth Amendment, the Fifth Amendment, and the Second Circuit's decision in Manindell v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979). If this Court agrees with Ms. Maxwell's arguments, not only

ntiff OPPOSING ATTORNEY: Paul Cassell address. phone number and e-mail) S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 150 E. 10th Avenue, Denver, CO 80203 383 S. University Street, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 303.831.7364; [email protected] 801.585.5202; [email protected] Court- Judge/

at the district court (or the appellees) unjustifiably delayed resolution of the unseal motions and its abuse of discretion in failing to adhere to the Second Circuit's "clear[]"3 precedent. We respectfully submit that neither conclusion warrants the extraordinary action being contemplated by the panel. A. The dist

ger Laura A. Menninger (LM-1374) Jeffrey S. Pagliuca (pro hac vice) Ty Gee (pro hac vice) Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver. CO 80203 Phone: Fax: Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell 21 EFTA00074984 Ca a:Mag0743tikIcAlPneDbt0rfiefiFO7203(11O3913/%1382eartafr 01246f 22 C

re "unjustified obstacles" or that the public will never have access to these documents -- reflect unjustified criticisms of the Protocol itself and the Second Circuit's decision in Brown, both of which fairly outline the legal process for parties and Non-Parties alike to be heard with respect to unsealing. Notably,

ng Docket Entries 164 and 230 at This Time. Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 EFTA00075004 CageaUlg0caAIDer0dthhilfii igl5V2Pil&iA6/2bagctacir4 2%f 3 Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, through her counsel and pursuant

19) (emphasis supplied; footnote omitted; quoting United States v. Amodeo, 44 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995) ("Amodeo r')). Amodeo I, the inception of the Second Circuit's principle that a file stamp is not a judicial-document talisman, is instructive. There an appointed Court Officer tasked parties; DE 204-1 referenc

3, 2020 Order (Doc. 1096) v. Ghislaine Maxwell, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) Haddon, Morgan and foreman, P C Laura A. Menninger 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 PH 303.831.7364 EX 303.832.2628 www.hmtlaw.com LMenningergthrntlaw.com Dear Judge Preska: I write in response to the Court's Ord

0 Cr. 330 (MN) (the "Criminal Action"). The information implicates Ms. Maxwell's right to due process and fairness in this civil action and affects the Second Circuit's review of the Court's unsealing order of July 23, 2020. Additionally, the information implicates her rights as a criminal defendant guaranteed unde

t 3, 2020 Order (Doc. 1096) v. Ghislaine Maxwell, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.0 Laura A. Menninger 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Pll 303.831.7364 EX 303.832.2628 www.hmtlaw.com LMenninger4hrntlaw.com Dear Judge Preska: I write in response to the Court's Ord

0 Cr. 330 (MN) (the "Criminal Action"). The information implicates Ms. Maxwell's right to due process and fairness in this civil action and affects the Second Circuit's review of the Court's unsealing order of July 23, 2020. Additionally, the information implicates her rights as a criminal defendant guaranteed unde