Epstein Secrets

h 29, 2021 (Dkt. No. 189). Regards, Nicole EFTA00103377 www.hmflaw.com Nicole Simmons Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 EFTA00103378

attention to page 5 of the joint letter, in which Menninger wrote: Indeed, this Court rejected Ms. Maxwell's argument that certain portions of the Response and its exhibits should be unredacted because the material had already been made public. See Dkt. No. 168 at 2-3; Letter Motion of Laura A. Menning

ER, IF NECESSARY, THE RESIDUAL HEARSAY RULE Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 EFTA00617178 Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell ("Ms. Maxwell") hereby files her Response to Plaintiff's Notice of Intent to Offer Statements

say without applicable exceptions, or based on other evidentiary grounds. Those issues will be argued at the appropriate time. For purposes of this Response, Ms. Maxwell simply notes the fundamental errors in the Notice, failure to comply with the rules, and general principles that make the residual hea

SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL NON-PRIVILEGED DOCUMENTS Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca HADDON, MORGAN, AND FOREMAN. P.C. East 101h Avenue Denver. CO 80203 EFTA00618132 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 191 Filed 06/06/16 Page 2 of 15 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 I. Plaintiff Concedes

irm that that his communications with Plaintiff regarding "media issues" were primarily for the purpose of providing legal advice. According to the Response "Ms. received legal advice from Mr. Pottinger regarding how to handle media inquiries in such a way as to not jeopardize her position in ongoing li

TO BOLES SCHILLER AND TO DISMISS COUNTS FIVE AND SIX Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim 33

I. The Government's Response to Maxwell's Motion. Confronted with evidence of AUSA misrepresentations to Judge McMahon, the government has filed a Response reluctantly admitting that the U.S. Attorney's Office had sustained contact with Boies Schiller in 2016. Even so, the government tries its best to m

Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTIONS IN LIMINE Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Denver Phone: Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP New York NY Phone: Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim Attorneys for Chislain

constitutes an impermissible constructive amendment and variance to the Indictment. Finally, what is clear from the government's proffer in their Response, the anticipated testimony o will serve as an improper constructive 13 EFTA00090739 amendment to, and an impermissible variance of, the Indictm