Epstein Secrets

y, as well as similar compensation funds for the Dioceses of Brooklyn and Rockville Centre, New York and for Dioceses in the states of California, Colorado, New Jersey and Pennsylvania. • Mr. Feinberg has served as adjunct professor of law at Harvard Law School, Columbia Law School, University of Penn

lly 3 EFTA00074746 protectable interest in the subject matter of litigation to protect himself from an action that might be detrimental to him." Hendricks, 2019 WL 918607, at •2; see also Stiles v. Yob, No. 2016-0036, 2016 WL 3884506, at *4 (V.I. July 13, 2016). The right to intervene under Rule 24(a)

tantial risk that the disposition of the litigation will impair the interest, and (3) the existing parties do not adequately protect that interest. Hendricks, 2019 WL 918607, at •2. Intervention is appropriate particularly, "when an individual has 'an unsecured claim, a cause of action against the estate'

:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/06/2009 Page 5 of 29 Jane Doe II v. Epstein. et al. Page 5 the principles articulated in Colorado River Water Consent. Dist. v. United States, 424 U.S. 800, 96 S.Ct. 1236, 47 L.Ed.2d 483 (1976) and Moses H. Cone Memorial Hosp. v. Mercury Constr.

ex post facto clause is implicated." See generally, Roman Catholic Bishop of Oakland v. Superior Court 28 Cal.Rptr.3d 355, at 360, citing Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346, 360-61 (1997). The effect of applying the 2006 version of §2255 would be to triple the amount of the presumptive minimum damages to

D A. LEBEDEKER MARKT. LuTTIER. PA. MICHAEL J. PIKE DAVID A. YAREMA RONDA BOARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIAL LAWYER 2ADRUTTED TO PRACTICE IN FLORIDA AND COLORADO Roy Black, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Kornspan & Ptumpf 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 March 4, 2010 Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.

cx post facto clause is implicated." See generally, Roman Catholic Bishop of Oakland'. Superior Court, 28 Cal.Rptr.3d 355, at 360, citing Kansas'. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346, 360-61 (1997). The effect of applying the 2006 version of §2255 would be to triple the amount of the presumptive minimum damages to

eam aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. 34 EFTA00225806 (196) On or about July 4, 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, , and traveled from Aspen, Colorado to Palm each County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. (197) On or about July 16, 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN

tion of the Petite Policy, it was a clear violation of well-settled law mandating that registration cannot be used as a form of punishment. Kansas' Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346, 362 (1997); Johnson' State, 795 So.2d 82, 87 (Fla. App. 5th Dist. 2000) ("Analogous to the cited Federal cases, the legislative inten