Epstein Secrets

nt Iraq, a designated state sponsor of terror, in a case stemming from the al- leged torture of several United States citi- zens who were working in Kuwait Dali- berti, 97 F.Supp2d at 46. Iraq argued that exercising personal jurisdiction over it would offend constitutional due process since the FSIA "

i- rected activities where defendant delivered products into stream of commerce with ex- pectation they would be purchased by resi- dents of forum); Calder, 465 U.S. at 789- 90, 104 S.Ct. 1482 (fording publishing ac- tivities outside of forum were calculated to cause injury to plaintiff in forum where

m, and the litigation results from al- leged injuries that arise out of or related to those activities"). Pursuant to the hold- ings in Thayer King, Calder, and three recent terrorism cases—Rein v. Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, 995 F.Supp. 325 (E.D.N.Y.1998), Daliberti v. Republic of Ira

EFTA00586929 Interests in the Fund are being offered only to a limited number of institutional and sophisticated individual investors in Jersey. Kuwait Notice to Investors in Kuwait Interests in the Fund have not been licensed for offering in Kuwait by the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, the Ku

pletion of federal income tax returns. Legal Counsel Goodwin Procter LLP, Tulloch & Co, and (as to matters of Cayman Islands law only) Maples and Calder will represent the General Partner and the Fund (but will not represent any Limited Partner) in connection with the organization of the Fund and th

he General Partner to monitor such compliance and to obtain the advice of counsel as the General Partner deems necessary or appropriate. Maples and Calder, PC/ Box 309, Ugland House, Grand Cayman, KY I-1104, Cayman Islands, acts as Cayman Islands legal counsel to the General Partner. In connection with

minimum contacts existed since dispute arose from a contract with substantial con- tacts with the forum) (internal quotations and citations omitted); Calder v. Jones, 465 U.S. 783, 789, 104 S.Ct. 1482, 79 L.Ed.2d 804 (1984) (finding personal juris- diction appropriate over non-resident de- fendants who “e

ant Iraq, a designated state sponsor of terror, in a case stemming from the al- leged torture of several United States citi- zens who were working in Kuwait. Dal- bertt, 97 F.Supp.2d at 46. Iraq argued that exercising personal jurisdiction over it would offend constitutional due process since the FSIA “ab

tates. Accordingly, Plaintiffs may rely on their “purposefully directed” theory to establish these mini- mum contacts. But as existed in Burger King, Calder, and the three terrorism cases, Plaintiffs must allege some personal or direct involvement by the Defendants in the conduct giving rise to their clai