Epstein Secrets

e. So I know him from 2997 until - wo - 14 aro at 2008. I knew him that entire time. In fact, when I went on the bench in 2003, 18 I referred to Stuart my employment case➢ that I had. It I had a great deal of respect for Stuart. 20 Stuart was a very prominent attorney in 21 the employment law a

s, but there were other firms that were representing other young woman that had been abused by him. Ye➢, I did know of those firms. There vas the Podhurst firm in Miami, a very prominent firms Bob Josofsborg, who I have known for years. Bob is one of the moat prominent attorneys also in South Florida

ost sought its release, it offers the first public look at the deal Epstein high-powered legal counsel brokered on his behalf. Mark Johnson of Stuart, '. a former federal prosecu- tor, described the dispar- ity in potential sentences as unusual, but even more so a provision on attorney payment.

back to the end of 2009 until May 11, 2010 - and even this invoice was without the charges of certain of the outside contractors relied upon by the Podhurst firm. We regret that these efforts did not resolve the matter and that Podhurst Orseck, P.A. elected instead to litigate. Mr. Epstein is today, in

Cases for Purposes of Discovery, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support by Jane Doe. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered: 03/26/2009) 67 Defendant's MOTION to Compel Response to 1st RTP by Jeffrey Epstein. Responses due by 4/20/2009 (Attachments: # 1 Exhib

National Bank Building 25 W Flagler Street Suite 800 Miami . FL 33130-1780 A Fax: Katherine Warthen Ezell LEAD ATTORNEY;ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg et al City National Bank Building 25 W Flagler Street Suite 800 Miami . FL 33130-1780 A Fax: Robert C Josefsberg LEAD ATTORNE

sought its release, it offers the first public look at the deal Epstein% high-powered , legal counsel brokered on his behalf. Mark Johnson of Stuart, a former federal prosecu- tor, described the dispar- ity in potential sentences ' as unusual, but even more so a provision on attorney payment.

the total fees (over $1,000,000) is for legal work that the invoices document were done by two outside attorneys who are not even attorneys with the Podhurst Orseck, P.A. law firm. Mr. Epstein's disputes the necessity for and redundancy of these charges. We respect Your Honor's selection and regret tha

t, Plaintiff's Jane Does 2-8' Memorandum Response to Defendant's Rule 4 Appeal by Jane Doe. Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al.(Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered: 05/28/2010) 06/14/2010 77 Emergency MOTION for Protective Order by Jane Doe II. Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al.(ots) (Enter

10 17 06/08/2010 18 06/11/2010 19 Proceeding Text COMPLAINT against Jeffrey Epstein. Filing fee $ 350.00 receipt number 113C-2870902, filed by Podhurst Orseck, P.A.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summon(s). # 3 Exhibit A - Non-Prosecution Agreement and Addendum. # 4 Exhibit B - Letter Da