Epstein Secrets

know who all is still there 4 because retail is down. 5 O. Was Larry Visoski a pilot used by MI 6 Wexner at any time? 7 A. No. O. How about David Rodgers? 9 A. No. 10 O. Are those names you're familiar with? 11 A. Yes. 12 O. Those we names you're familiar with how? 13 A. I flew with them when

h, that previous corporation sold the 6 airplane. 7 O. Oh, they did? A. Yeah. He had no choice. They were out of 9 work. 10 O. So Larry and David were about to be out of 11 work. 12 A. Yes. 13 O. So they said, "Hey, we found a new job and 14 it's with this guy Jeffrey Epstein and he's b

and he brought • this is all speculation • and, 16 I think, he brought Larry on board. 17 O. So as far as you know, however you know, David 18 Rodgers was the first Epstein contact and then Larry 19 Visoski rode it in. 20 A. The way I understand. yeah. 21 O. How did you become Involved in the

No. 5020006020051 On behalf of the Defendant by telephone: IX/WM AD JRFPRRY DITHER. e BURMAN. CRITTON. LUTTIER & COLEMAN Defendant . I 9 BY: MICHAEL J. PIKE. ESO.. 515 N. Fla or Drtve DEPOSITION OF 10 Suito 400 lm ad,. FL 33401 LARRY MAUNA NORAISON 11 TAKEN On SHALT OF INA PLAINTIFF October 4. 20

/0 Lg_S PASSENGERS Arrival Time Pilots: Dave Rodgers, Larry Vbeskl Plight Engineer: Larry Morrison

JEGE, INC. PASSENGER MANIFEST Registration Number N988JE Type: Tonal DATE: d- -3 2005 FROM Ttr in /0 Lg_S PASSENGERS Arrival Time Pilots: Dave Rodgers, Larry Vbeskl Plight Engineer: Larry Morrison cm* TO 70 ‘. -1- ;b6,--C; ) =Mr 3 /42 4. Coe 5. t,/b Mucieza 7. 8. 1-..44.14) ?

NG, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN BY: BRADLEY EDWARDS, ESQ. ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN: BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP BY: MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. ON BEHALF OF OTHER PLAINTIFFS IN RELATED CASES: MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. 305.931.2200 [email protected] BY: STUART S. MERMELSTE

r assistance and the interview was concluded at this time. I recei ile from T-Mobile Cellular service on telephone number , which is assigned to David Rodgers, pilot for Mr. Epstein, who resides in Lake Wo s' telephone number was dialed on several occasions by . A background on Rodgers indicated he has

assigned to David Rodgers, pilot for Mr. Epstein, who resides in Lake Wo s' telephone number was dialed on several occasions by . A background on Rodgers indicated he has a valid FAA pi of icense First Class for the Southern FAA Region. Rodgers has another historical FAA license for Airline Transpor

ruce E. Reinhart, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach Florida 33401 Fax. Counsel for Defendant Robert D. Critton, Esq. Michael J. Pike, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach Florida 33401 Fax. Co-Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein

ce and the interview was concluded at this time. I received a facsimile from T-Mobile Cellular service on telephone number , which is assigned to David Rodgers, pilot for Mr. Epstein, w o rest es in Lake Worth. Rod ers' telephone number was dialed on several occasions by . A background on Rodgers indicat

to David Rodgers, pilot for Mr. Epstein, w o rest es in Lake Worth. Rod ers' telephone number was dialed on several occasions by . A background on Rodgers indicated he has a valid FAA pi of icense First Class for the Southern FAA Region. Rodgers has another historical FAA license for Airline Transpor

P . Bruce E. , P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Fax. Counsel for Defendant Robert D. Critton, Esq. Michael J. Pike, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Fax. Co-Counsel for Jeffrey Epstei

t in discussing how a court is to analyze the application of the privilege stated - ... It is for the court to say whether his silence is justified, Rogers v. United States, 1951, 340 U.S. 367, 71 S.Ct. 438, and to require him to answer if 'it clearly appears to the court that he is mistaken.' Temple v

t Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein By: ---r~f-=-----.%,,:--¥-1-----t+-'t--- R OB R D. C ITTON, Florida Bar No. 224162 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 [email protected] BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561-84

nk Mr. Willits is aware of this. There was a subpoena duces tecum for this witness, as well as the previous witness, which was another pilot, Dave Rogers, and that duces teoum was to bring the flight logs related from 1998 through 2005. What was produced at the previous deposition were flight logs f

ite 400 West Palm Be , FL 33401 (561) 842- (561) 84 By: __;,,_,___,~:1---___:...p_ .. '1-:-q_}-__ R e . Critton, Jr. ~( F orida Bar #224162 Michael J. Pike Florida Bar #617296 (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 402 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2009 Page 17

rt in discussing how a court is to analyze the application of the privilege stated- ... It is for the court to say whether his silence is justified, Rogers v. United States, 1951, 340 U.S. 367, 71 S.Ct. 438, and to require him to answer if 'it clearly appears to the court that he is mistaken.' Temple v

Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 15 of 15 Page 15 By: --4~~--+--11---- ROB D. RI N, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 [email protected] BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561-84

in discussing how a court is to analyze the application of the privilege stated — ... It is for the court to say whether his silence is justified, Rogers v. United States 1951, 340 U.S. 367, 71 S.Ct. 438, and to require him to answer if 'it clearly appears to the court that he is mistaken.' Temple v.

65 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 15 of 15 Page 15 Respec By: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 rcritabcIclaw.com MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 mpikeebelclaw.com BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561-84

in discussing how a court is to analyze the application of the privilege stated — ... It is for the court to say whether his silence is justified, Rogers v. United States, 1951, 340 U.S. 367, 71 S.Ct. 438, and to require him to answer if 'it clearly appears to the court that he is mistaken.' Temple v

gment (summary or otherwise) or waiver of his 5ih Amendment right and face potential criminal prosecution. By: ROBERT D. C Florida Bar No. 24162 MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 ., ESQ. Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Cl

he Fifth (like Epstein) rather than provide information in discovery. For example, I was given reason to believe that Larry Visoski, Larry Harrison, David Rogers, Louella Rabuyo, ME, Ghislaine Maxwell, Mark Epstein, and Janusz Banasiak all had lawyers paid for by Epstein. Because Epstein and the co-conspirator

Plaintiff's position is that the parties have already complied with the mediation requirements. By: s/Robert D. Critton, Jr. Robert D, Critton, Jr. Michael J. Pike Attorneys for Defendant Epstein HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013478 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 168 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/28/2010 Pa