Epstein Secrets

rt in discussing how a court is to analyze the application of the privilege stated- ... It is for the court to say whether his silence is justified, Rogers v. United States, 1951, 340 U.S. 367, 71 S.Ct. 438, and to require him to answer if 'it clearly appears to the court that he is mistaken.' Temple v

rests of persons not parties to the civil litigation; and (5) the interest of the public in the pending civil and criminal litigation. See U.S. v. Pinnacle Quest International, 2008 WL 4274498 (N.D. Fla. 2008). 6 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 65 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 7 of 15 Page 7 First, m app

in discussing how a court is to analyze the application of the privilege stated — ... It is for the court to say whether his silence is justified, Rogers v. United States 1951, 340 U.S. 367, 71 S.Ct. 438, and to require him to answer if 'it clearly appears to the court that he is mistaken.' Temple v.

rests of persons not parties to the civil litigation; and (5) the interest of the public in the pending civil and criminal litigation. See U.S. v. Pinnacle Quest International, 2008 WL 4274498 (N.D. Fla. 2008). 6 EFTA00222530 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 65 Entered on FLSD Docket 03,'25:2009 Page 7 of 15 Page 7

in discussing how a court is to analyze the application of the privilege stated — ... It is for the court to say whether his silence is justified, Rogers v. United States 1951, 340 U.S. 367, 71 S.Ct. 438, and to require him to answer if 'it clearly appears to the court that he is mistaken.' Temple v.

rests of persons not parties to the civil litigation; and (5) the interest of the public in the pending civil and criminal litigation. See U.S. v. Pinnacle Quest International, 2008 WL 4274498 (N.D. Fla. 2008). 6 EFTA00067388 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 65 Entered on FLSD Docket 03,'25:2009 Page 7 of 15 Page 7