Epstein Secrets

it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency. EFTA00178034 FD-302a (Rev. 10-6.95) 31E-MM-108062 Continuation of FO-302 of Courtney Wild ,On 08/07/2007 Page 2 girls she could bring. When EPSTEIN telephoned, he usually asked for WILD to come over. According to WILD, EPSTEIN's hous

U if she saw her photograph. ,WILD also stated that LAUREN LNU at EFTA00178024 FD•302a (Rev. 10-6-95) 31E-MM-108062 Continuation of FD-302 of Courtney Wild MI108/07/2007 Page 4 one time attended PALM BEACH CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL. WILD also believed that they had met through a group of friends while a

friends with Miller. Rivera advised that she met with private investigators for Epstein's attorneys and that the same investigators had contacted Wild. The private investigators inquired about Rivera's age when she was with Epstein and how much money she was paid by Epstein. They also asked Rivera

e Constitution. Even in the case of In re Dean, 527 F.3d 391 (5th Cir. 2008), upon which the plaintiffs rely, the district court, after remand from the Fifth Circuit, denied the motion of the victims to invalidate the defendant's plea agreement as a remedy for the claimed violation of the Crime Victims' Rights A

is, see td. at 149—50 n.29. 47 S. Ct. 21, because we must consider the constitutional issues whether or not they apply to the specific facts of Ms. Wilds case, ()Clark. 543 U.S. at 380. 125 S. Ct. at 724. This is not some groundbreaking method of statutory interpretation—it is simply the canon of co

against Epstein. II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Because no prosecution was underway for years and lacking any information about the case, on July 7, 2008, Courtney Wild (proceeding as "Jane Doe I") filed an emergency petition in "the district court in the district in which the crime occurred." See 18 U.S.C. § 3771(

A. Id. The district court rejected the victims' request, and the victims filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, pursuant to § 377l (d)(3). ? I Id. Upon review, the Fifth Circuit concluded, as discussed above, that " '[t]here am clearly rights under the CVRA

it. And like. for instance. Courtney — Courtney Wild. a lot of girls begged me to bring them back. Th

line with it. And like. for instance. Courtney — Courtney Wild. a lot of girls begged me to bring them back. Th

(5th Cir. 2010) (Fifth Amendment rights of organization were violated when its name was listed among 246 unindicted coconspirators 'This opinion of the Fifth Circuit was made binding precedent in the Eleventh Circuit pursuant to Bonner'. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en bane). 8 EFTA00

that “there was an agreement reached” and “we would not be pursuing this federally.” In October 2007, for example, the case agents met with victim Courtney Wild, “to advise her of the main terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement.” According to the case agent, during that meeting, the case agents told Wild “t

ey Wild, “to advise her of the main terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement.” According to the case agent, during that meeting, the case agents told Wild “that an agreement had been reached, Mr. Epstein was going to plead guilty to two state charges, and there would not be a federal prosecution.”302

was intended to be broad,” as well as being a “mechanism[]” to ensure that victims were treated with fairness. In denying the victims relief, the Fifth Circuit nevertheless concluded that the district court “failed to accord the victims the rights conferred by the CVRA.”346 In particular, the Fifth Circuit

ert Burk of El Paso and Ethan Sturgis Day of Idyl!wild, California, were sentenced to federal prison fo

ing strategies that promote integration, inclusion, and citizenship." According to the article, the concurrence came as the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit rejected an appeal from a Cambodian immigrant who argued that a Pennsylvania robbery statute was too broad to match the federal version that would t