Epstein Secrets

erated offense. Identified Individuals Courtney Wild UNITED STATES AI I ORNEY Dated: By: A. VILLA

viduals identified below arc individuals whom the United States was prepared to name as a victim of an enumerated offense. Identified Individuals Courtney Wild UNITED STATES AI I ORNEY Dated: By: A. VILLAFARA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY ACKNOWLEDGMENT I have received this Notification from my attorney, G

e victims were not properly notified about event during that investigation. 59. RFP No. 25 requests all initial productions that are required under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This is a protective request to ensure that, should it be determined that the Civil Rules apply, they then receive all materials to whic

rs at his busy law practice. This was a complete wild goose chase, as the U.S. Attorney's Office was c

we are also writing to ask for your non-opposition to Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4's motion to intervene in the case. As you know, Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows intervention on two grounds: Mandatory intervention is allowed where a putative intervenor "claims an inter relating to the . . .

are not seeking to force some kind of burdensome wild goose chase on the U.S. Attorney's Office. In the

rs. III. PETITIONERS HAVE NO RIGHT TO DISCOVERY UNDER THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Petitioners argue they arc entitled to discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, but they point to no particular rule, or case, which provides that such a discovery rights exists. Instead, petitioners seize upon the g

are not seeking to force some kind of burdensome wild goose chase on the U.S. Attorney's Office. In the

itioners. PETITIONERS HAVE NO RIGHT TO DISCOVERY UNDER THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Petitioners argue they arc entitled to discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, but they point to no particular rule, or case, which provides that such a discovery rights exists. Instead, petitioners seize upon the g

are not seeking to force some kind of burdensome wild goose chase on the U.S. Attorney's Office. In the

itioners. PETITIONERS HAVE NO RIGHT TO DISCOVERY UNDER THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Petitioners argue they arc entitled to discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, but they point to no particular rule, or case, which provides that such a discovery rights exists. Instead, petitioners seize upon the g