8
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
8 / 8
Mentions
engage in a commercial sex act. United States v. Wild , 143 Fed. Ar.938, 942 (10th Cir. 2005). Epstein
e activity was not "sexual enough" to qualify as "prostitution." Title 18 carries no definition of "prostitution." In United States v. Prince , the Fifth Circuit approved of the generic definition "sexual intercourse for hire" where the West Virginia statues also lacked a definition. Prince , 515 F.2d 564, 5
internal citations omitted). Cf. United States v. Wild , 143 Fed. Appx. 938, 942 (4th Cir. 2005) (the p
e activity was not "sexual enough" to qualify as "prostitution." Title 18 carries no definition of "prostitution." In United States v. Prince , the Fifth Circuit approved of the generic definition "sexual intercourse for hire" where the West Virginia statues also lacked a definition. Prince , 515 F.2d 564, 5
engage in a commercial sex act. United States v. Wild , 143 Fed. AS8, 942 (10th Cir. 2005). Epstein's
e activity was not "sexual enough" to qualify as "prostitution." Title 18 carries no definition of "prostitution." In United States v. Prince , the Fifth Circuit approved of the generic definition "sexual intercourse for hire" where the West Virginia statues also lacked a definition. Prince , 515 F.2d 564, 5
internal citations omitted). Cf. United States v. Wild , 143 Fed. Appx. 938, 942 (4th Cir. 2005) (the p
e activity was not "sexual enough" to qualify as "prostitution." Title 18 carries no definition of "prostitution." In United States v. Prince , the Fifth Circuit approved of the generic definition "sexual intercourse for hire" where the West Virginia statues also lacked a definition. Prince , 515 F.2d 564, 5
. Maxwell's location. A headline reminiscent of a Wild West wanted poster read: "WANTED: The Sun is off
at (name) has been indicted 19 EFTA00093064 Case 21-770. Document 17-1, 04/01/2021, 3068296, Page22 of 31 in making your decision in this case); Fifth Circuit: ("The indictment ... is only an accusation, nothing more. It is not proof of guilt or anything else. The defendant therefore starts out with a cle
internal citations omitted). Cf. United States v. Wild , 143 Fed. Appx. 938, 942 (4th Cir. 2005) (the p
Page: EFTA02857732_p4 →e activity was not "sexual enough" to qualify as "prostitution." Title 18 carries no definition of "prostitution." In United States v. Prince , the Fifth Circuit approved of the generic definition "sexual intercourse for hire". Prince , 515 F.2d 564, 566 (5th Cir. 1975). FI2 In 1946, the Supreme Court defin
Page: EFTA02857732_p7 →internal citations omitted). Cf. United States v. Wild , 143 Fed. Appx. 938, 942 (4th Cir. 2005) (the p
Page: EFTA02857763_p4 →e activity was not "sexual enough" to qualify as "prostitution." Title 18 carries no definition of "prostitution." In United States v. Prince , the Fifth Circuit approved of the generic definition "sexual intercourse for hire". Prince , 515 F.2d 564, 566 (5th Cir. 1975). Fl In 1946, the Supreme Court define
Page: EFTA02857763_p7 →internal citations omitted). Cf. United States v. Wild , 143 Fed. Appx. 938, 942 (4th Cir. 2005) (the p
Page: EFTA02857810_p4 →e activity was not "sexual enough" to qualify as "prostitution." Title 18 carries no definition of "prostitution." In United States v. Prince , the Fifth Circuit approved of the generic definition "sexual intercourse for hire" where the West Virginia statues also lacked a definition. Prince , 515 F.2d 564, 5
Page: EFTA02857810_p7 →Entities connected to both Courtney Wild and Fifth Circuit

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONLeon Black
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONMaria Farmer
PERSON
Joe Biden
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Prince Charles
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Samantha Power
PERSON
Woody Allen
PERSON