11
Shared Docs
7
Same-Page
14 / 11
Mentions
it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency. EFTA00178034 FD-302a (Rev. 10-6.95) 31E-MM-108062 Continuation of FO-302 of Courtney Wild ,On 08/07/2007 Page 2 girls she could bring. When EPSTEIN telephoned, he usually asked for WILD to come over. According to WILD, EPSTEIN's hous
U if she saw her photograph. ,WILD also stated that LAUREN LNU at EFTA00178024 FD•302a (Rev. 10-6-95) 31E-MM-108062 Continuation of FD-302 of Courtney Wild MI108/07/2007 Page 4 one time attended PALM BEACH CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL. WILD also believed that they had met through a group of friends while a
friends with Miller. Rivera advised that she met with private investigators for Epstein's attorneys and that the same investigators had contacted Wild. The private investigators inquired about Rivera's age when she was with Epstein and how much money she was paid by Epstein. They also asked Rivera
statements of a witness on the subject of his testimony are the kind of evidentiary matter to which an adversary is entitled. F198. The Court in Jencks quoted the language of Mr. Clgef Justice Marshall in United State Burr, 25 Fed.Cas., No. 14,694, pp. 187, 191 (Va. 1807): "Now, if a paper be in
flow with it. And like. for instance. Courtney — Courtney Wild.' lot of girls begged me to bring them back. The
it. And like. for instance. Courtney — Courtney Wild.' lot of girls begged me to bring them back. The
, their credibility and the foundations. il' any. for claiming personal istiory. Also. Mr. Epstein would have received, pursuant to either Brady or Jencks. material in the Ponta of prior inconsistent statements made by these women before they learned of any financial benefit that may be available to th
engage in a commercial sex act. United States v. Wild , 143 Fed. Ar.938, 942 (10th Cir. 2005). Epstein
re-interviewed some of the girls, but limited their questions to "new" topics, such as the specific means of contact, to avoid creating inconsistent Jencks materials. The agents also delved into Epstein's history and interviewed others and obtained records to corroborate the girls' stories. FBI also in
internal citations omitted). Cf. United States v. Wild , 143 Fed. Appx. 938, 942 (4th Cir. 2005) (the p
re-interviewed some of the girls, but limited their questions to "new" topics, such as the specific means of contact, to avoid creating inconsistent Jencks materials. The agents also delved into Epstein's history and interviewed others and obtained records to corroborate the girls' stories. FBI also in
engage in a commercial sex act. United States v. Wild , 143 Fed. AS8, 942 (10th Cir. 2005). Epstein's
re-interviewed some of the girls, but limited their questions to "new" topics, such as the specific means of contact, to avoid creating inconsistent Jencks materials. The agents also delved into Epstein's history and interviewed others and obtained records to corroborate the girls' stories. FBI also in
internal citations omitted). Cf. United States v. Wild , 143 Fed. Appx. 938, 942 (4th Cir. 2005) (the p
re-interviewed some of the girls, but limited their questions to "new" topics, such as the specific means of contact, to avoid creating inconsistent Jencks materials. The agents also delved into Epstein's history and interviewed others and obtained records to corroborate the girls' stories. FBI also in
internal citations omitted). Cf. United States'. Wild, 143 Fed. Appx. 938, 942 (4th Cir. 2005) (the pa
e-interviewed some of the girls, but limited their questions to "new" topics, such as the specific means of contact, to avoid creating inconsistent Jencks materials. The agents also delved into Epstein's history and interviewed others and obtained records to corroborate the girls' stories. FBI also in
e-interviewed some of the girls, but limited their questions to "new" topics, such as the specific means of contact, to avoid creating inconsistent Jencks materials. The agents also delved into Epstein's history and interviewed others and obtained records to corroborate the girls' stories. FBI also in
Page: EFTA02857524_p4 →internal citations omitted). Cl United States v. Wild, 143 7 EFTA02857530 Fed. Appx. 938, 942 (4th
Page: EFTA02857524_p7 →re-interviewed some of the girls, but limited their questions to "new" topics, such as the specific means of contact, to avoid creating inconsistent Jencks materials. The agents also delved into Epstein's history and interviewed others and obtained records to corroborate the girls' stories. FBI also in
Page: EFTA02857732_p2 →internal citations omitted). Cf. United States v. Wild , 143 Fed. Appx. 938, 942 (4th Cir. 2005) (the p
Page: EFTA02857732_p4 →re-interviewed some of the girls, but limited their questions to "new" topics, such as the specific means of contact, to avoid creating inconsistent Jencks materials. The agents also delved into Epstein's history and interviewed others and obtained records to corroborate the girls' stories. FBI also in
Page: EFTA02857763_p2 →internal citations omitted). Cf. United States v. Wild , 143 Fed. Appx. 938, 942 (4th Cir. 2005) (the p
Page: EFTA02857763_p4 →Entities connected to both Courtney Wild and Jencks

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONLeon Black
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Joe Biden
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSON
Prince Charles
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Woody Allen
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Samantha Power
PERSON