Epstein Secrets

it. And like. for instance. Courtney — Courtney Wild. a lot of girls begged me to bring them back. Th

line with it. And like. for instance. Courtney — Courtney Wild. a lot of girls begged me to bring them back. Th

oncerns. The Section 2255 provision issue was first discussed at a July 31, 2007, meeting between FAU SA , Criminal Chief_, West Palm Beach Chief Lourie, AUSA Villafafia, and two FBI agents who met with Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt, and Lilly Ann Sanchez. On that date, the prosecutors presented a writ

that “there was an agreement reached” and “we would not be pursuing this federally.” In October 2007, for example, the case agents met with victim Courtney Wild, “to advise her of the main terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement.” According to the case agent, during that meeting, the case agents told Wild “t

ey Wild, “to advise her of the main terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement.” According to the case agent, during that meeting, the case agents told Wild “that an agreement had been reached, Mr. Epstein was going to plead guilty to two state charges, and there would not be a federal prosecution.”302

demand for the equipment. In late June 2007, defense attorney Sanchez requested an extension of time to comply; in informing Sloman, Menchel, and Lourie of the request, Villafaña stressed that “we want to get the computer equipment that was removed from Epstein’s home prior to the state search warran

id not inform them about the NPA.431 On January 31, 2008, the FBI agents, Villafana, and the CEOS Trial Attorney interviewed three victims, including Courtney Wild, and they interviewed at least one more victim the next day.432 Wild and two others had been contacted by the FBI in the fall of 2007 and may have be

t this time of the state plea; rather, she likely only told those who knew about the resolution from the FBI. In her own 2015 CVRA- case declaration, Wild stated that she “was not told about any [NPA] or any potential resolution of 431 FBI agents also interviewed victims in March and May of 2008, withou

disenfranchise and silence the victims. It is unfortunate, and appears fundamentally unfair to the victims, that Acosta and Sloman (after Menchel and Lourie departed) took the unusual step of deciding to vet the USAO victim notification letters with the defense after the NPA was signed, but failed to go b

us Income . 1 7 Nonomptom conlpansallon $ $ 6 WILD andWMcm plitrAIS Substitute open In feu of dM4t

tralian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone 561 209-1047 Fax 561 820-8777 Tracking: 1 EFTA00176059 Recipient [email protected] Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS) Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) Read Read: 5/22/2007 7:28 PM Read: 5/23/2007 9:01 AM 2 EFTA00176060 U.S. Department of Justice Uni

ent’s interactions with victims, OPR concludes that victims were not treated with the forthrightness and sensitivity expected by the Department. Wild’s criticisms of the government’s conduct were based on interactions that are similar to and generally representative of the government’s interaction

enfranchise and silence the victims. It is unfortunate, and appears fundamentally unfair to the victims, that Acosta and Sloman (after Menchel and Lourie departed) took the unusual step of deciding to vet the USAO victim notification letters with the defense after the NPA was signed, but failed to go