4
Shared Docs
0
Same-Page
6 / 4
Mentions
style. Other gold medalists were St. Thomas’ Max Wilson (boys 11-12 200-meter backstroke), and STSA’s gir
he was coming to visit, and she brought some drugs.” Corrections officers told police they had smelled marijuana in a pair of black Jordan sneakers Petersen was bringing to Gordon, according to a VIPD press release. When correc- tions officers pulled apart the sneak- ers, they discovered two small plastic
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014501 →harge of introducing contraband into prison, and was free on $10,000 bail about six hours later, according to her arrest record. VI. police arrested Petersen on Friday afternoon about 1:47 p.m., after corrections officers discovered the marijuana hidden in the personal belongings of inmate Omari Gordon, a
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014501 →CRIMINAL LAW: CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS DURING CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS? APPLYING THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT BEFORE CRIMINAL CHARGES ARE FILED
Water Conservation Dist. v. United States ex rel. Wilson, 130 S. Ct. 1396, 1409 (2010) (quoting United Sta
at victims acquire rights even before a prosecution begins. The District Court for the Northern District of Indiana held to the same effect in In re Petersen. 7* There, the court held that a victim's right to be treated with fairness and with respect for [his or her] dignity and privacy "may apply before a
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017614 →. 76 Id. Petersen also held that one specific CVRA right - the right to confer - only applies after charges have been filed. Id. But the authorities Petersen cites for that proposition prove no such thing. Confusingly, Petersen cited the Fifth Circuit's ruling in Dean for support; but (as just explained ab
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017614 →Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges Are Filed
Water Conservation Dist. v. United States ex rel. Wilson, 130 S. Ct. 1396, 1409 (2010) (quoting United Sta
t victims acquire rights even before a prosecution begins.” The District Court for the Northern District of Indiana held to the same effect in In re Petersen. There, the court held that a victim’s right to be treated with fairness and with respect for [his or her] dignity and privacy “may apply before any
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014053 →Article: Criminal Enforcement Redundancy: Oversight of Decisions Not to Prosecute
rk Joseph Stern, Why the Feds Can't Charge Darren Wilson: They Should, but the Supreme Court Gutted the Ci
as well as juries) are unduly skeptical of rape allegations. '7? And there is good evidence that law enforcement agencies’ responses to 19 See In re Petersen, No. 2:10-CV-298 RM, 2010 WL 5108692, at 2 (N.D. Ind. Dec. 8, 2010) (concluding that prosecutors control charging decisions and certain victim rights
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016535 →Entities connected to both Petersen and E.O. Wilson

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Cynthia Nixon
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
Paul Ryan
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
John F. Kennedy
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Harvey Weinstein
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONRubin
PERSON
Eric Holder
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON