Epstein Secrets

-out the heart of Defendant's case (and the defenses thereto) while simultaneously brandishing their allegations as a shield from disclosure of any Achilles heel. II. Memorandum of Law a. The Allegations in the Amended Complaints As to Jane Does 2-7 9 EFTA00729252 13. The amended complaints filed

N Defendant. Plaintiff. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-80993-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 08-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON 2 EFTA00729245 JANE DOE, Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, Defendants. CASE NO.: 08-80893-C1V-MARRA/JOHNSON DOE II, Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, Defendants. CA

oduct protection as a sword to cut out the heart of an opposing party's case while simultaneously brandishing it as a shield from disclosure of any Achilles heels." Stern v. O'Quinn, 253 F.R.D. 663, 677 (S.D. Ha. 2008). Or, as the Eleventh Circuit has articulated the principle, a litigant "can no more ad

Document 422 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2017 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08-cv-80736-KAM JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES, Respondent. JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR FINDING OF WAIVER OF WORK

oduct protection as a sword to cut out the heart of an opposing party's case while simultaneously brandishing it as a shield from disclosure of any Achilles heels." Stern v. O'Quinn, 253 F.R.D. 663, 677 (S.D. Fla. 2008) (citing Kailas v. Carnival Corp., 2008 WL 2222152, *5 n. 1 (S.D.Fla. May 27, 2008) (c

Document 414 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/11/2017 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08-cv-80736-KAM JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES, Respondent. JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF WAIVER OF WORK PRODUCT AND SIMILAR