Epstein Secrets

orrespondence, including the attachments and the response of Assistant Ethics Counsel Gail E. Ferguson, dated November 4, 2008. In her letter, Ms. Ferguson reported that she could not provide an opinion letter because my inquiry was based, in part, on past conduct and that she could not provide legal ad

Josefsberg, causing them great distress." I conferred with Mr. Josefsberg's firm. Mr. Josefsberg himself has not contacted any victim. His partner, Kathy Ezell, attempted to contact three victims before receiving Mr. Mermelstein's notification of representation. Ms. Ezell spoke directly only to one victim,

, in part, on past conduct and that she could not provide legal advice regarding my obligations pursuant to statute or court order. Nonetheless, Ms. Ferguson did refer me to the relevant Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, specifically Rules 4-7.4(a), 4-4.2(a), and 4- 3.4(c). EFTA00216178 Rule 4-7.4 Mr.

Josefsberg, causing them great distress." I conferred with Mr. Josefsberg's firm. Mr. Josefsberg himself has not contacted any victim. His partner, Kathy Ezell, attempted to contact three victims before receiving Mr. Mermelstein's notification of representation. Ms. Ezell spoke directly only to one victim,

orrespondence, including the attachments and the response of Assistant Ethics Counsel Gail E. Ferguson, dated November 4, 2008. In her letter, Ms. Ferguson reported that she could not provide an opinion letter because my inquiry was based, in part, on past conduct and that she could not provide legal ad

Josefsberg, causing them great distress." I conferred with Mr. Josefsberg's firm. Mr. Josefsberg himself has not contacted any victim. His partner, Kathy Ezell, attempted to contact three victims before receiving Mr. Mermelstein's notification of representation. Ms. Ezell spoke directly only to one victim,

espondence, including the attachments and the response of Assistant Ethics Counsel Gail E. Ferguson, dated November 4, 2008. F'- In her letter, Ms. Ferguson reported that she could not provide an opinion letter because my inquiry was based, in part, on past conduct and that she could not provide legal ad

Josefsberg, causing them great distress." I conferred with Mr. Josefsberg's firm. Mr. Josefsberg himself has not contacted any victim. His partner, Kathy Ezell, attempted to contact three victims before receiving Mr. Mermelstein's notification of representation. Ms. Ezell spoke directly only to one victim,

ESS: The top right coma is a 2 message from the Duchess of York. 3 MR. PIKE: Kathy, can you hit mute on your 4

22 23 24 25 make the record clear you spoke to Ms. O'Connor, correct, at the beginning of today? MR. KUVIN: It was actually a discussion with Kathy Ezell as to whether or not they would get to her, and that's where the discussion went MR. PIKE: I just want to make sure that discussion wasn't with m