Epstein Secrets

, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Brad Edwards, Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler

areas that could result in criminal prosecution. Hubbell, 530 U.S. at 35-36. Accordingly, any compelled te

, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Pal

mpelled testimonial aspect. See United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). Thus, where the exis

561-588-8819 Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80811 [email protected] Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 561-686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9424 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel fo

predictably used to bolster the criminal-related allegations against Epstein. See generally Hoffman v United States 341 US 479, 486 (1951), U.S. v Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 36 (2000). 11 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 282 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2009 Page 12 of 20 12 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KA

, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Pal

a compelled testimonial aspect." United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. at 36; see also Fisher v. United State

alian Avenue, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: Fax: Co-counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: Fax: [email protected] inh@searcvlaw,com Counsel for Plaintiff...

e act of production where, as here, it involves a self-incriminating testimonial communication or "a compelled testimonial aspect." United States v, Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 120 S.Ct. 2037 (2000)• Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976); McCormick on Evidence, Title 6, Chap. 13. The Privilege Against