Epstein Secrets

ere was originally, my understanding is, two CDs that were delivered to Fowler White for printing. Those documents were then put onto one CD, with Bates numbers, and the documents were printed. So we now have a single CD, that's correct. THE COURT: And is the information contained on this disputed

the objection of the law firm, the electronic documents were to be turned over to Fowler White so that Fowler White could print out a hard copy of Bates stamped, numbered e-mails extracted from those multiple compact disks. This Court entered an order on November 30, 2010, recognizing the fact that

o it, and they've asked Judge Hafele to do the same thing. He hasn't ruled on it. So, to ask this Court to instruct Judge Hafele what to do in his Chambers, and the 4th DCA what to do in their Chambers, I don't think makes sense, but I do think your Honor has the jurisdiction to look at your order and

2 of 23 Epstein or his legal counsel might misappropriate these documents while in their physical possession for the limited purpose of copying and Bates numbering them, this Court specifically ordered that "Fowler White will not retain any copies of the documents contained on the discs provided to i

ad represented a number of Epstein's victims in their civil suits against Epstein. Farmer Jaffe sought to have Epstein bear the costs of copying and Bates stamping these thousands of documents [DE 1120], ultimately resulting in an order from this Court that Epstein's counsel— attorneys at the law firm

. Courts also have the inherent power to sanction a party for misconduct. Chambers v. Nasco, 501 U.S. 32, 42 (1991). As the Supreme Court stated in Chambers, "[i]t has long been understood that certain implied powers must necessarily result to our courts of justice from the nature of their institution, p

signed Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Second Supplemental Privilege Log. The index has been marked with Bates Numbers P-013970' thru P-014923. The documents referenced in the Second Supplemental Privilege Log will be delivered today to the Chambers of U.S.

l Privilege Log, the undersigned discovered an error on the Supplemental Privilege Log, that is, the last entry states that the last document bears Bates Numbers P-013956 thru P-013846. The correct Bates range for that document is P-013956 thru P-013969 [14 pages]. 1 EFTA00185428 Case 9:08-cv-8073

notice of its filing of its Privilege Log, which is attached hereto. The documents referenced in the Privilege Log are being delivered today to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex parte in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Order. Respectfully submitted, UNITED STAT

originally, my understanding 3 is, two CDs that were delivered to Fowler White for 4 printing. Those documents were then put onto one CD, with 5 Bates numbers, and the documents were printed. So we now 6 have a single CD, that's correct. 7 THE COURT: And is the information contained 8 on this d

they've asked 16 Judge Hafele to do the same thing. He hasn't ruled on it. 17 So, to ask this Court to instruct 18 Judge Hafele what to do in his Chambers, and the 4th DCA 19 what to do in their Chambers, I don't think makes sense, 20 but I do think your Honor has the jurisdiction to look at 21 your

e attached as Exhibit J to the Edwards Declaration accompanying this filing (hereinafter cited as "U.S. Attorney's Correspondence" and referenced by Bates number stamp).' Because Epstein has moved to keep these documents from the public, they are at this time filed under seal with the Court. Threugh-

of the notice for counsel to respond. In the absence of a response, the Clerk of Court may destroy documents filed under seal. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Florida, this day of May, 2014. Kenneth Marra United States District Judge cc: All counsel -8- EFTA00191329 Case 9:08-cv