Epstein Secrets

n the courtroom? 14 MR. EDWARDS: Your Honor, I was informed 15 that Mr. Paul Cassell was to call into this hearing on 16 behalf of L.M., E.W. and S.R. 17 THE COURT: I don't --- 18 MR. EDWARDS: I don't know what arrangements 19 he made. 20 THE COURT: No such arrangements were made. 21 So, well

: Cassell is C-a-s-s-e-I-1. 5 THE COURT: And who are you representing in 6 this matter? 7 MR. CASSELL: I represent putative 8 intervenors L.M., E.W. and Jane Doc, who have a pending 9 motion for leave to intervene. 10 THE COURT: All right. Let me ask, is there 11 any opposition to the motion

present in the courtroom? 14 MR. EDWARDS: Your Honor, I was informed 15 that Mr. Paul Cassell was to call into this hearing on 16 behalf of L.M., E.W. and S.R. 17 THE COURT: I don't --- 18 MR. EDWARDS: I don't know what arrangements 19 he made. 20 THE COURT: No such arrangements were made. 21

present in the courtroom? MR. EDWARDS: Your Honor, I was informed that Mr. Paul Cassell was to call into this hearing on behalf of L.M., E.W. and S.R. THE COURT: I don't MR. EDWARDS: I don't know what arrangements he made. THE COURT: No such arrangements were made. So, we'll just -- on the moti

r Shapiro present in the courtroom? MR. EDWARDS: Your Honor, I was informed that Mr. Paul Cassell was to call into this hearing on behalf of L.M., E.W. and S.R. THE COURT: I don't MR. EDWARDS: I don't know what arrangements he made. THE COURT: No such arrangements were made. So, we'll just -- on

R. CASSELL: Cassell is C-a-s-s-e-1-1. THE COURT: And who are you representing in this matter? MR. CASSELL: I represent putative intervenors L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, who have a pending motion for leave to intervene. THE COURT: All right. Let me ask, is there any opposition to the motion to interve

Q. Put it this way: How are they identified in the caption that you filed? A. Well, also the three that were filed, one was ~~ one was the initials S.R. I referred to Miss S.R. yesterday. That was the Jane Doe case in Federal Court in front of Judge Marra. There were two state claims. I'll -- I'll i

. yesterday. That was the Jane Doe case in Federal Court in front of Judge Marra. There were two state claims. I'll -- I'll identify the clients as E.W. and L.M. Q. And then the fourth one? A. The fourth one, I believe -- the initial M. ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS (954) 331-4400 261 and I believe

the victim by both the FBI Victim-Witness Specialist and AUSA a¶ 3. Petitioner's counsel, Brad Edwards, Esq., currently represents C.W., T.M., and S.R. The U.S. Attorney's Office victim notification letter to C.W. was provided by the 1:131. and the letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by AUSA UMto her

ATE OF FLORIDA, E.W., THE PALM BEACH POST, B.B, Respondents. E.W.'S SEALED REQUEST TO DISMISS THE PETITION FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION Respondent, E.W., would show the Court as follows: 1. This Court lacks jurisdiction to hear this petition. The order under review is a non-final order for which no