Epstein Secrets

any information about the case, on July 7, 2008, Courtney Wild (proceeding as "Jane Doe I") filed an emerg

A. Id. The district court rejected the victims' request, and the victims filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, pursuant to § 377l (d)(3). ? I Id. Upon review, the Fifth Circuit concluded, as discussed above, that " '[t]here am clearly rights under the CVRA

W11.078cpbc=B05CB03A2tdesti... 9/26/2011 EFTA00178021 FD-302 (Rev. 104-95) -1- FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Date of transcription 08/14/2007 COURTNEY WILD was interviewed in West Palm Beach, Florida, regarding a federal investigation involving the sexual exploitation of minors. After being advise

e Constitution. Even in the case of In re Dean, 527 F.3d 391 (5th Cir. 2008), upon which the plaintiffs rely, the district court, after remand from the Fifth Circuit, denied the motion of the victims to invalidate the defendant's plea agreement as a remedy for the claimed violation of the Crime Victims' Rights A

& ELLIS LLP • • • December ?I . 1007 Page 4 A: Every girl that I brought to Jeffrey. they said they were line with it. And like. for instance. Courtney — Courtney Wild. a lot of girls begged me to bring them back. They wanted to come back for the money. And as far as I know, we all had him there. (

(5th Cir. 2010) (Fifth Amendment rights of organization were violated when its name was listed among 246 unindicted coconspirators 'This opinion of the Fifth Circuit was made binding precedent in the Eleventh Circuit pursuant to Bonner'. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en bane). 8 EFTA00

07, for example, the case agents met with victim Courtney Wild, “to advise her of the main terms of the Non

was intended to be broad,” as well as being a “mechanism[]” to ensure that victims were treated with fairness. In denying the victims relief, the Fifth Circuit nevertheless concluded that the district court “failed to accord the victims the rights conferred by the CVRA.”346 In particular, the Fifth Circuit