Epstein Secrets

make any sense. What is the universe we are 13 talking about? 14 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I certainly understand all 15 of the members of the Boles firm that currently represent her. 16 The third individual, if I understand correctly, is a gentleman 17 by the name of Stan Pottinger. He is a l

ed in full because there are no -- there is no material within the caveat in the document. 165-3. Exhibit C. This is a copy of a motion to join in Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 files in court. That document is SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00076449 Case 20-2413, Document 44, 08/20/2

ation in opposition. That 11 can be unsealed in full because there is no material included 12 in the caveats in the document. 13 185-2. Copy of Jane Doe's no. 3 and 4 corrected 14 joinder motion. Already filed in public. 15 185-3. Response to the motion to intervene. Already 16 filed in public. 1

CHRISTU,MAURA SLOPE TRAIL LLC BOYLES,KEVAN K GILBANE,THOMAS SAFFER,VIVIA

QUINN,OLIVER H LOCKER,NANCY OWEN,JANE D CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD KELLER,MICHAEL

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Mr. Boies? MR. BOIES: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: Hold on one second. Mr. Boles, just wait until we finish with them. I take it that the answer is yes? MR. BOIES: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: Go ahead. MR. : Your Honor, my

have alleged and now proven that the previous non-prosecution agreement was structured in violation of the rights of many of the victims. was the Jane Doe in that lawsuit. And for that reason, she has a particular interest in this case. We want to first say we appreciate your Honor's acknowledgment S

jeffrey-epstein-maxwell-case-20201013- jinz117zdrzdgrbbs7yc6bfnszu-stoty.htnal. 8 EFTA00086670 At that time, however, the government did not act. Boles "was particularly frustrated by the failure to pursue a perjury charge [against Maxwell]," reported one person, who recalled him saying, "We have h

on granted the government's ex parte request, Magistrate Judge Netburn rejected an identical request from the government in a different civil case, Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein, Case No. 17-cv-616 (JGK) (SN). Judge Netbum recognized the government's conduct for what it was: an attempt to deprive Maxwell of not

this revised disclosure pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 and states as follows: A. Witnesses: I. Virginia L. Giuffre c/o Sigrid S. McCawley, Esq. Boles, Schiller & Flexner LLP 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1200 Miami, Florida 33301 Tel: (954) 356-0011 Email: [email protected] Plaintiff-

covery Requests to Plaintiff. 2. On April 5, 2016, I spoke by telephone with Assistant United States Attorney Marie Villafana, counsel of record in Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 v. United States, #08- 80736-CIV, pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, otherwise kno

-1.1465631 EFTA00075069 Cea110812111004032112160AVINDISitioititrSINWIME28207Agacanif 8 The Honorable Alison J. Nathan July 21, 2020 Page 6 Mr. Boles and Ms. McCawley gave on-air interviews with ABC News following Ms. Maxwell's detention that contained repeated, presumptively prejudicial quotes, i

ein's "first-known victim" says she was sexually abused by the now-dead pedophile — who called himself her "Godfather" — when she was 13 years old. Jane Doe met Epstein and his friend, Ghislaine Maxwell, in the summer of 1994 at Michigan's interlochen Arts Camp, where she was In voice training, according

ell-case-20201013- jinz117zdrzdgrbbs7yc6bfnszu-stoty.htnal. 8 EFTA00011464 --- PAGE BREAK --- At that time, however, the government did not act. Boles "was particularly frustrated by the failure to pursue a perjury charge [against Maxwell]," reported one person, who recalled him saying, "We have h

t from the government in a different civil case, Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein, Case No. 17-cv-616 (JGK) (SN). Jud

ell-case-20201013- jinz117zdrzdgrbbs7yc6bfnszu-stoty.htnal. 8 EFTA00029089 --- PAGE BREAK --- At that time, however, the government did not act. Boles "was particularly frustrated by the failure to pursue a perjury charge [against Maxwell]," reported one person, who recalled him saying, "We have h

t from the government in a different civil case, Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein, Case No. 17-cv-616 (JGK) (SN). Jud

ell-case-20201013- jinz117zdrzdgrbbs7yc6bfnszu-stoty.htnal. 8 EFTA00029828 --- PAGE BREAK --- At that time, however, the government did not act. Boles "was particularly frustrated by the failure to pursue a perjury charge [against Maxwell]," reported one person, who recalled him saying, "We have h

t from the government in a different civil case, Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein, Case No. 17-cv-616 (JGK) (SN). Jud