Epstein Secrets

CHRISTU,MAURA SLOPE TRAIL LLC BOYLES,KEVAN K GILBANE,THOMAS SAFFER,VIVIA

ALLEN,JOSEPH FISHER,MARJORIE S SCHELLER,DR ZBIGNIEW PAGLIARI,RICHARD A KIER

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Mr. Boies? MR. BOIES: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: Hold on one second. Mr. Boles, just wait until we finish with them. I take it that the answer is yes? MR. BOIES: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: Go ahead. MR. : Your Honor, my

nswer is yes? MR. BOIES: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: Go ahead. MR. : Your Honor, my understanding, including from representatives of the Boies, Schiller law firm, is that victims have expressed the views that we conveyed to the Court. I was not aware of any victims or victims' counsel who wished t

jeffrey-epstein-maxwell-case-20201013- jinz117zdrzdgrbbs7yc6bfnszu-stoty.htnal. 8 EFTA00086670 At that time, however, the government did not act. Boles "was particularly frustrated by the failure to pursue a perjury charge [against Maxwell]," reported one person, who recalled him saying, "We have h

aw firm had provided that information well before the investigation began. The government did indeed have previous contact with the firm. And Boies Schiller was instrumental in fomenting the Maxwell prosecution. The record is surpassingly clear: But for the government's misrepresentation, witting or not

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Mr. Boies? MR. BOIES: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: Hold on one second. Mr. Boles, just wait until we finish with them. I take it that the answer is yes? MR. BOIES: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: Go ahead. MR. : Your Honor, my

nswer is yes? MR. BOIES: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: Go ahead. MR. : Your Honor, my understanding, including from representatives of the Boies, Schiller law firm, is that victims have expressed the views that we conveyed to the Court. I was not aware of any victims or victims' counsel who wished t

, rather than the subject of the subpoena, was the moving party). During the conference, the Government was not able to explain why it, rather than Boles Schiller, made the application. Boles Schiller is perfectly capable of protecting its own interests. The law firm's failure to seek for itself perm

r than the subject of the subpoena, was the moving party). During the conference, the Government was not able to explain why it, rather than Boles Schiller, made the application. Boles Schiller is perfectly capable of protecting its own interests. The law firm's failure to seek for itself permission to

be joining. He just walked in. 17 18 MS. McCAWLEY: On behalf of nonparty 18 19 Sigrid McCawley and my 19 20 colleague Meredith Schultz from Boles. Schiller 20 21 & Plexner. 21 22 22 MR. INDYKE: On behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. 23 23 Darren Indyke. 24 24 SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Ed Pon

ning. He just walked in. 17 18 MS. McCAWLEY: On behalf of nonparty 18 19 Sigrid McCawley and my 19 20 colleague Meredith Schultz from Boles. Schiller 20 21 & Plexner. 21 22 22 MR. INDYKE: On behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. 23 23 Darren Indyke. 24 24 SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Ed Ponuoli as 2

lawsuit against Mr. Dershownz, who responded with his own counterclaim. Mr. Boies's firm soon entered the fray. In late 2014, a lawyer at the firm, Boles, Schiller and Flexner, agreed to represent Ms. in legal matters not directly related to the Justice Department lawsuit When Mr. Dershowitz's name s

t against Mr. Dershownz, who responded with his own counterclaim. Mr. Boies's firm soon entered the fray. In late 2014, a lawyer at the firm, Boles, Schiller and Flexner, agreed to represent Ms. in legal matters not directly related to the Justice Department lawsuit When Mr. Dershowitz's name surfaced in

-1.1465631 EFTA00075069 Cea110812111004032112160AVINDISitioititrSINWIME28207Agacanif 8 The Honorable Alison J. Nathan July 21, 2020 Page 6 Mr. Boles and Ms. McCawley gave on-air interviews with ABC News following Ms. Maxwell's detention that contained repeated, presumptively prejudicial quotes, i

fight with Epstein's alleged victims long before her recent arrest. "(Maxwell] has been using this Court as a sword and a shield for many years." Schiller wrote in a filing earlier this year, "and she, Jeffrey Epstein, and their other co-conspirators have attempted to thwart their victims from obtaini

1 FACTUAL BACKGROUND 2 A. The Protective Order in v. Maxwell 2 B. Maxwell's April and July 2016 depositions 4 C. The Settlement And Boies Schiller's Refusal To Comply With The Protective Order 6 D. The Government's False Statements To Judge McMahon 6 E. Judge Netburn Separately Rejects An

law firm had provided that information well before the investigation began. The government did indeed have previous contact with the firm. And Pomp Schiller was instrumental in fomenting the Maxwell prosecution. The record is surpassingly clear: But for the government's misrepresentation, witting or not

ell-case-20201013- jinz117zdrzdgrbbs7yc6bfnszu-stoty.htnal. 8 EFTA00011464 --- PAGE BREAK --- At that time, however, the government did not act. Boles "was particularly frustrated by the failure to pursue a perjury charge [against Maxwell]," reported one person, who recalled him saying, "We have h

McMahon that the prosecutors had no idea what was in Boies Schiller's file. Indeed, he insisted, there had been no contact whatsoever between Boies Schiller and United States Attorney's Office before the government commenced its investigation. Nor, said the prosecutor, did Boies Schiller have any role in

aw firm had provided that information well before the investigation began. The government did indeed have previous contact with the firm. And Boies Schiller was instrumental in fomenting the Maxwell prosecution. The record is surpassingly clear: But for the government's misrepresentation, witting or not

ell-case-20201013- jinz117zdrzdgrbbs7yc6bfnszu-stoty.htnal. 8 EFTA00029089 --- PAGE BREAK --- At that time, however, the government did not act. Boles "was particularly frustrated by the failure to pursue a perjury charge [against Maxwell]," reported one person, who recalled him saying, "We have h