Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
confidentiality provision that require[ed] us to inform Mr. Epstein's counsel before making any disclosure."170 154. On September 18, 2008, attorney Katherine Ezell representing some of Epstein's victims emailed the line prosecutor, asking whether the NPA was "blessed" by Judge Marra. The line prosecutor emaile
s "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Local Rule 56.1, move for summary judgment on the issue of the United States Government's violation of their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), where no genuine issue of material fact exists.' In support, they state: INT
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
confidentiality provision that require[ed] us to inform Mr. Epstein's counsel before making any disclosure."170 154. On September 18, 2008, attorney Katherine Ezell representing some of Epstein's victims emailed the line prosecutor, asking whether the NPA was "blessed" by Judge Marra. The line prosecutor emaile
s "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Local Rule 56.1, move for summary judgment on the issue of the United States Government's violation of their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), where no genuine issue of material fact exists.' In support, they state: INT
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
confidentiality provision that require[ed] us to inform Mr. Epstein's counsel before making any disclosure."170 154. On September 18, 2008, attorney Katherine Ezell representing some of Epstein's victims emailed the line prosecutor, asking whether the NPA was "blessed" by Judge Marra. The line prosecutor emaile
s "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Local Rule 56.1, move for summary judgment on the issue of the United States Government's violation of their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), where no genuine issue of material fact exists.' In support, they state: INT
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
confidentiality provision that require[ed] us to inform Mr. Epstein's counsel before making any disclosure.s170 154. On September 18, 2008, attorney Katherine Ezell representing some of Epstein's victims emailed the line prosecutor, asking whether the NPA was "blessed" by Judge Marra. The line prosecutor emaile
s "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Local Rule 56.1, move for summary judgment on the issue of the United States Government's violation of their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), where no genuine issue of material fact exists.' In support, they state: INT
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (82)
Entities connected to both Katherine Ezell and the United States Government's
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON60 w/ Katherine·4 w/ the
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION39 w/ Katherine·4 w/ the
Alexander Acosta
PERSON33 w/ Katherine·3 w/ the
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON25 w/ Katherine·4 w/ the
Kenneth Marra
PERSON23 w/ Katherine·4 w/ the
Bradley Edwards
PERSON21 w/ Katherine·4 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION18 w/ Katherine·4 w/ the
LB
Leon Black
PERSON17 w/ Katherine·4 w/ the
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON17 w/ Katherine·4 w/ the
Paul Cassell
PERSON16 w/ Katherine·4 w/ the
United States
LOCATION16 w/ Katherine·4 w/ the
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON15 w/ Katherine·4 w/ the
A. Marie Villafana
PERSON15 w/ Katherine·2 w/ the
HE
Herman
PERSON11 w/ Katherine·4 w/ the
FBI
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Katherine·4 w/ the
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Katherine·4 w/ the
Jeffrey Marc Herman
PERSON10 w/ Katherine·4 w/ the
Palm Beach Police Department
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Katherine·4 w/ the
RB
Roy Black
PERSON10 w/ Katherine·4 w/ the
Barry Diller
PERSON11 w/ Katherine·3 w/ the