Epstein Secrets

confidentiality provision that require[ed] us to inform Mr. Epstein's counsel before making any disclosure."170 154. On September 18, 2008, attorney Katherine Ezell representing some of Epstein's victims emailed the line prosecutor, asking whether the NPA was "blessed" by Judge Marra. The line prosecutor emaile

quires that there be no disputed issues that are genuine or material for the moving party to be entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See, e.g., Joseph v. Napolitano, 839 F. Supp. 2d 1324, 1333 (S.D. Fla. 2012). The undisputed facts "3 See Exhibit 88. 174 Exhibit 26; Exhibit 27; Exhibit 62; Exhibit 63 at 4-6, 18

confidentiality provision that require[ed] us to inform Mr. Epstein's counsel before making any disclosure."170 154. On September 18, 2008, attorney Katherine Ezell representing some of Epstein's victims emailed the line prosecutor, asking whether the NPA was "blessed" by Judge Marra. The line prosecutor emaile

quires that there be no disputed issues that are genuine or material for the moving party to be entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See, e.g., Joseph v. Napolitano, 839 F. Supp. 2d 1324, 1333 (S.D. Fla. 2012). The undisputed facts "3 See Exhibit 88. 174 Exhibit 26; Exhibit 27; Exhibit 62; Exhibit 63 at 4-6, 18

lity provision that require[ed] us to inform Mr. Epstein's counsel before making any disclosure." Id. at 46, 1 153. On September 18, 2008, attorney Katherine Ezell representing some of Epstein's victims emailed the line prosecutor, asking whether the NPA was "blessed" by Judge Marra. The line prosecutor emaile

equires that there be no disputed issues that are genuine or material for the moving party to be entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See, e.g., Joseph v. Napolitano, 839 F. Supp. 2d 1324, 1333 (E. Fla. 2012). If the evidence offered by the nonmoving party is 17 EFTA00597334 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 41

confidentiality provision that require[ed] us to inform Mr. Epstein's counsel before making any disclosure."170 154. On September 18, 2008, attorney Katherine Ezell representing some of Epstein's victims emailed the line prosecutor, asking whether the NPA was "blessed" by Judge Marra. The line prosecutor emaile

quires that there be no disputed issues that are genuine or material for the moving party to be entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See, e.g., Joseph v. Napolitano, 839 F. Supp. 2d 1324, 1333 (S.D. Fla. 2012). The undisputed facts " 3 See Exhibit 88. IM Exhibit 26; Exhibit 27; Exhibit 62; Exhibit 63 at 4-6, 18