Epstein Secrets

ell, Defendant, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS. ii. The Names and Addresses and Telephone and Fax Numbers of Trial Counsel: Plaintiff's Trial Counsel: David Boies: Boies Schiller & Flexner 333 Main Street Armonk, NY 10504 Tel: 914-749-8200 Fax: 914-749-8300 [email protected] Sigrid McCawley: Boies Schil

on grounds of authenticity, and two stars indicating exhibits to which no party objects on any ground. 17 EFTA00792772 Respectfully Submitted, BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP By: /s/ Sigrid McCawley Sigrid S. McCawley(Pro Hac Vice) Meredith Schultz (Pro Hac Vice) Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP 40

d, the media obtained copies of the motion. At issue is a January 2, 2015, statement prepared by Ms. Maxwell's British solicitor Philip Barden. Mr. Barden sent the statement to Ms. Maxwell for approval and, following approval, caused Mr. Gow to send (via email) the statement to six to thirty members of

Maxwell, Defendant, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS. The Names and Addresses and Telephone and Fax Numbers of Trial Counsel: Plaintiff's Trial Counsel: David Boies: Boies Schiller & Flexner 333 Main Street Armonk, NY 10504 Tel: Fax: Sigrid McCawley: Boies Schiller & Flexner 401 E. Las Olas Boulevard, Sui

on grounds of authenticity, and two stars indicating exhibits to which no party objects on any ground. 17 EFTA00617412 Respectfully Submitted, BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP By: /s/ Sigrid McCawley Sigrid S. McCawley(Pro Hac Vice) Meredith Schultz (Pro Hac Vice) Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP 40

d, the media obtained copies of the motion. At issue is a January 2, 2015, statement prepared by Ms. Maxwell's British solicitor Philip Barden. Mr. Barden sent the statement to Ms. Maxwell for approval and, following approval, caused Mr. Gow to send (via email) the statement to six to thirty members of

fendant. Before: 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS) Oral Argument New York, N.Y. March 31, 2017 12:08 p.m. HON. ROBERT W. SWEET, District Judge APPEARANCES BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff BY: SIGRID S. McCAWLEY, ESQ. MEREDITH L. SCHULTZ, ESQ. S.J. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF LAW AT THE UNIVERS

hey have the burden of proving that what Ms. Maxwell said was false. That's what is at issue. We have to look at Ms. Maxwell's statement issued by Barden and Gow and then go backwards from there. And the burden on the plaintiff is proving falsity of that statement. It is not the situation where -- wh

33 (RWS) Oral Argument New York, N.Y. March 31, 2017 12:08 p.m. 10 Before: 11 HON. ROBERT W. SWEET, 12 District Judge 13 APPEARANCES 14 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff BY: SIGRID S. McCAWLEY, ESQ. 16 MEREDITH L. SCHULTZ, ESQ. 17 S.J. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF LAW AT

the burden of proving that what Ms. Maxwell said was false. 16 That's what is at issue. We have to look at Ms. Maxwell's 17 statement issued by Barden and Gow and then go backwards from 18 there. And the burden on the plaintiff is proving falsity of 19 that statement. It is not the situation whe