Epstein Secrets

. glione number and e-mail] KCampbell-Law, PLLC BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER UP v. Maxwell OPPOSING ATTORNE

Nixon, 435 U.S. at 598 ("[C]ourts have refused to permit their files to serve as reservoirs of libelous statements for press consumption . . . ."); Amodeo II, 71 F.3d at 1051 ("Raw, unverified information should not be as readily disclosed as matters that are verified. Similarly, a court may consider whe

Defendant. x 9 New York, N.Y. 10 July 23, 2020 11:30 a.m. 11 Before: 12 HON. LORETTA A. PRESKA, 13 District Judge 14 APPEARANCES 15 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP 16 Attorney for Plaintiff BY: SIGRID S. MCCAWLEY 17 HADDON, MORGAN, AND FOREMAN, P.C. 18 Attorney for Defendant BY:

ess, the court must determine the weight to be afforded to the presumption and then balance the interest in access against competing considerations. Amodeo II, 71 F.3d at 1050. Competing considerations include, but are not limited to, the reliance interests of those resisting disclosure, the constitutiona

), Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C., Denver, CO, for Defendant-Appellee Ghislaine Maxwell. 3 EFTA00092310 PAUL G. CASSELL (Sigrid S. McCawley, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, on the brief), S.J Quinney College of Law, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, for Plaintiff-Appell

documents submitted in connection with, and relevant to, such judicial decision-making are subject to at least some presumption of public access. Amodeo II, 71 F.3d at 1049. 30 Id. at 1050. 31 Id. 32 Id. at 1049. 3 33 In previous decisions, we have identified an important exception to this general