Epstein Secrets

mit the law firm of Boles Schiller Flexner LLP ("Boies Schiller") to comply with a grand jury subpoena.

ndertook before granting the order; and (4) the nature of reliance on the order." In re Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer (EPDM) Antitrust Ling., 255 F.R.D. 308, 318 (1:10. Conn. 2009). The first factor—the scope of the Protective Order—favors granting the Government's application for modification. As discu

the heart of the request, the Court was troubled to that replacement counsel for matter, learn i.e., Mr. at the June Cooper & Kirk, counsel, Boies had received from former Schiller Flexner,3 the Maxwell materials at issue in their entirety. Asked to explain how those materials came into the

dertook before granting the order; and (4) the nature of reliance on the order. In re Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer (EPDM) Antitrust Litig., 255 F.R.D. 308, 318 (D. Conn. 2009). At a broad level, Mr. Dershowitz has simply not demonstrated the existence of an "extraordinary circumstance or compelling

fre Action"), in order to permit the law firm of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP ("Boies Schiller") to comply

ndertook before granting the order; and (4) the nature of reliance on the order." In re Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer (EPDM) Antitrust Ling., 255 F.R.D. 308, 318 (D. Conn. 2009). The first factor—the scope of the Protective Order—favors granting the Government's application for modification. As discusse