Epstein Secrets

nly in 2014, when her lawyers `pressured' her to do so for financial reasons."2° (u) August 30, 2019, on NewsmaxTV:2' "[A]s soon as [Plaintiff] met David Boies and the other lawyers, suddenly she remembered having had sex with me. It's totally made up. I never met her." (v) October 19, 2019, on Twitter: "

then they meet David Boies, and suddenly they make accusations. There's a term for that, and I want the federal government to be examining whether Boies is guilty of subornation of perjury. I want the federal government to examine whether Boies is guilty of extortion, of trying to get a billion doll

d not claim that Plaintiff's lawyers had told him that they did not believe her. 86. Instead, the morning of December 9, 2015, Defendant pleaded: "David, Have we given up on a mutually acceptable statement from VR or you. Let's keep trying. We are not that far apart." When Plaintiff's lawyer did not

omen first indicate they never had sex with me; then they meet Boies. Then they suddenly `remember' they had sex with me. Boies must know that both Accusers cannot be believed and that they made up the stories about me in the hope of getting money (which they got). Yet, he submitted their false affidavi

heir credibility without disclosing to the courts their documented history of lying about prominent people." ii. "In all three instances, my false Accusers have refused to make their accusations to the media on the record. They have made them only in court papers, hiding behind the litigation privilege

mited number of emails from the attorneys (see Exs. 6 & 7).30 AUSA-1 did not participate in a second meeting with those attorneys and has never met David Boies. (See Ex. 4 at 4). AUSA-1 recalls being aware of depositions as a general matter, but she does not recall having knowledge of who had been deposed

ges, based on a New York Daily News article, that Boies Schiller and the Government colluded starting in

As to Epstein's mother, who died in April 2004, the defendant contends that she "would have testified that she did not observe Ms. Maxwell with any Accusers between 1994 and 1997." (Def. Mot. 7 at 9). "Counsel's unswom assertions as to vague generalities" that witnesses, "if alive, would give testimony

mited number of emails from the attorneys (see Exs. 6 & 7).30 AUSA-1 did not participate in a second meeting with those attorneys and has never met David Boies. (See Ex. 4 at 4). AUSA-1 recalls being aware of depositions as a general matter, but she does not recall having knowledge of who had been deposed

gain cites the subpoena the Government issued to Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP ("Boles Schiller") to obta

As to Epstein's mother, who died in April 2004, the defendant contends that she "would have testified that she did not observe Ms. Maxwell with any Accusers between 1994 and 1997." (Def. Mot. 7 at 9). "Counsel's unworn assertions as to vague generalities" that witnesses, "if alive, would give testimony

mited number of emails from the attorneys (see Exs. 6 & 7).30 AUSA-1 did not participate in a second meeting with those attorneys and has never met David Boies. (See Ex. 4 at 4). AUSA-1 recalls being aware of depositions as a general matter, but she does not recall having knowledge of who had been deposed

gain cites the subpoena the Government issued to Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP ("Boles Schiller") to obta

As to Epstein's mother, who died in April 2004, the defendant contends that she "would have testified that she did not observe Ms. Maxwell with any Accusers between 1994 and 1997." (Def. Mot. 7 at 9). "Counsel's unworn assertions as to vague generalities" that witnesses, "if alive, would give testimony

ited number of emails from the attorneys (see Exs. 6 & 7).3° AUSA- I did not participate in a second meeting with those attorneys and has never met David Boies. (See Ex. 4 at 4). AUSA- I recalls being aware of depositions as a general matter, but she does not recall having knowledge of who had been deposed

ges, based on a New York Daily News article, that Boies Schiller and the Government colluded 60 EFTA000

As to Epstein's mother, who died in April 2004, the defendant contends that she "would have testified that she did not observe Ms. Maxwell with any Accusers between 1994 and 1997." (Def. Mot. 7 at 9). "Counsel's unworn assertions as to vague generalities" that witnesses, "if alive, would give testimony

gain cites the subpoena the Government issued to Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP ("Boles Schiller") to obta

mited number of emails from the attorneys (see Exs. 6 & 7).30 AUSA-1 did not participate in a second meeting with those attorneys and has never met David Boies. (See Ex. 4 at 4). AUSA-1 recalls being aware of depositions as a general matter, but she does not recall having knowledge of who had been deposed

As to Epstein's mother, who died in April 2004, the defendant contends that she "would have testified that she did not observe Ms. Maxwell with any Accusers between 1994 and 1997." (Def. Mot. 7 at 9). "Counsel's unworn assertions as to vague generalities" that witnesses, "if alive, would give testimony

ell sought authorization to subpoena the law firm Boies Schiller for materials it submitted to EVCP on b

ative support" that the administrator may consider in evaluating claims." Maxwell also mischaracterizes the Protocol when she says that it "rewards Accusers who have filed a lawsuit, legal action or claim of sexual abuse."18 This is inaccurate. As the Protocol makes clear, the existence of "lawsuit[s], l