Epstein Secrets

656:9 665:11 773:25 body (1) 714:15 716:6 calendar (2) 668:14 671:6,8 believe (17) 771:15 716:20 717:4 695:3,6 672:14 675:5 668:14 684:3 Boies (3) 717:18 718:14 call (21) 697:1,1,3,9 693:3 713:20 650:8 652:20 718:19,19 654:10 658:16 700:23 708:14 741:11 753:17 727:4 719:9,9 720:3

escription (4) credit (1) Dated (1) 764:18,20 702:22 703:1 694:11 731:24 688:16 779:20 declare (1) 722:10,19,21 732:2 734:12 credited (2) David (44) 781:22 722:24,24 descriptions (9) 754:8 755:11 669:9,15 670:4 defamatory (1) 723:3,8,8 731:5,12,21,23 crime (4) 670:24 671:13 692:22

uestion. 2 A. I don't think he was aware that Jeffrey 2 Please proceed. 3 Epstein had nude an allegation of that kind. 3 A. One of them was a Conner president or 4 Q. At the time when David Markus called you 4 chairman or at least member of the Florida Bar 5 to tell you that Brad Edwards par

omments, which serve no compelling law enforcement or investigatory purpose, are prohibited by the local rules of this District. New York attorney David Boies and his partner Sigrid McCawley, who represent several witnesses in this matter, have also made public and presumptively prejudicial statements in

practicing in this District, generally, and lawyers for witnesses, specifically. See Rule 23.1(a) and (b). As reported by the Washington Post, Mr. Boies expressed his views on the prohibited subject of "the possibility of a plea of guilty to the offense charged or a lesser offense" in violation of s

nt which they may have refused to testify.... [T]he witnesses were entitled to rely upon the terms of a concededly valid protective order and Judge Conner did not abuse his discretion in refusing to vacate or modify that order. Id at 296-97. Three, the government did not obtain a copy of the depositi

er and e-mail) Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP OPPOSING ATTORNEY: Sigrid

which they may have refused to testify. . . . [T]he witnesses were entitled to rely upon the terms of a concededly valid protective order and Judge Conner did not abuse his discretion in refusing to vacate or modify that order. Id. at 296-97. Three, the government did not obtain a copy of the deposit

rk, had received from plaintiff's former counsel, Boies Schiller Flexner, various discovery materials th

nt which they may have refused to testify.... [T]he witnesses were entitled to rely upon the terms of a concededly valid protective order and Judge Conner did not abuse his discretion in refusing to vacate or modify that order. Id at 296-97. Three, the government did not obtain a copy of the depositi

rk, had received from plaintiff's former counsel, Boies Schiller Flexner, various discovery materials th

nt which they may have refused to testify.... [T]he witnesses were entitled to rely upon the terms of a concededly valid protective order and Judge Conner did not abuse his discretion in refusing to vacate or modify that order. M at 296-97. Three, the government did not obtain a copy of the depositio

eridge & Diamond Bingham Greenebaum Blank Rome Boies Schiller Bond Schoeneck Bose McKinney Bowles R

Werner Cipriani and Werner Clark Hill Cleary Gottlieb Cohen & Grigsby Cole Schotz Cole Scott Connell Foley EFTA00032318 --- PAGE BREAK --- Conner & Winters Conroy Simberg Constangy Brooks Cox Castle Cozen O'Connor Crowe & Dunlevy Crowell & Moring Crowley Fleck Cullen & Dykman Curtis Ma