nt which they may have refused to testify.... [T]he witnesses were entitled to rely upon the terms of a concededly valid protective order and Judge Conner did not abuse his discretion in refusing to vacate or modify that order. M at 296-97. Three, the government did not obtain a copy of the depositio

ivation is necessary, because routine discomfort is part of the penalty inmates pay for their crimes (Hudson v. McMillan 503 US I (1992); Sandhi v. Conner 515 US 472 (1995)). Thus, in order to establish that a deprivation violates the Eighth Amendment, a prisoner must satisfy: (i) an objective test by

Werner Cipriani and Werner Clark Hill Cleary Gottlieb Cohen & Grigsby Cole Schotz Cole Scott Connell Foley EFTA00032318 --- PAGE BREAK --- Conner & Winters Conroy Simberg Constangy Brooks Cox Castle Cozen O'Connor Crowe & Dunlevy Crowell & Moring Crowley Fleck Cullen & Dykman Curtis Ma