Epstein Secrets

and an unidentified woman), represented by David Boies, sued Epstein's estate in Federal District Court

ed by Epstein for three years starting at age 14.1'733 , et al. v. Epstein's estate (2019) Five women , and an unidentified woman), represented by David Boies, sued Epstein's estate in Federal District Court in Manhattan in November 2019, accusing him of rape, battery and false imprisonment and seeking uns

were released. Two sets of additional sealed documents will be analyzed by a federal judge to determine whether they should also be made public. A "John Doe" asked the judge on September 3 to permanently keep the documents secret, claiming "unproven allegations of impropriety" could damage his reputatio

8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 4 MS. STAR: Laura Star. MR. POSEN: Andrew Posen [Ph.]. MR. GOLDFARB: Alan Goldfarb. THE COURT: Got it. Then I have David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Josh Schiller. MR. BOIES: Good morning, Your Honor. David Boies. MR. SCHILLER: Josh Schiller. Good morning. MS. McCAWLEY: Sigri

tar. MR. POSEN: Andrew Posen [Ph.]. MR. GOLDFARB: Alan Goldfarb. THE COURT: Got it. Then I have David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Josh Schiller. MR. BOIES: Good morning, Your Honor. David Boies. MR. SCHILLER: Josh Schiller. Good morning. MS. McCAWLEY: Sigrid McCawley. THE COURT: Got it. Marion Wang a

ng to be organized and have a nice presentation. I appreciate it. I'm not trying to be critical. I'm just saying it's really not necessary. On the John Doe -- John Doe? Jane Doe, Jane Doe issues, I have no problem signing an order. The only question is what form of order. And because there are several

LORETTA A. PRESKA, District Judge APPEARANCES BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff

LLAND & KNIGHT Attorneys for Intervenors Julie Brown and Miami Herald Media Company BY: CHRISTINE N. WALZ KRIEGER KIM & LEWIN, LLP Attorneys for John Doe Defendants BY: PAUL M. KRIEGER SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.•• (212) 805-0300 EFTA00082164 L1JMGIUC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13

m's Petition; CVRA-authorized analysis charts, victim/witness who are not parties to this release; Material Severable; Redaction; No photographs, DAVID records, NCICs, and related materials for persons identified as litigation Assertion by Victims Jane Does #15, 16, 17, 18, 19, Past Employees, M

y's Conduct is at Issue — If the attorney's conduct is a central issue in the case, the work-production protection does not apply. See, e.g., In re John Doe, 662 F.2d 1073, 1080 (4th Cir. 1981); Charlotte Moto• Speedway, Inc. v. International Ins. Co., 125 F.R.D. 127, 130 (M.D.N.C. 1989). E Rule 6(c) —