Epstein Secrets

f potential Government witnesses associated with Boies Schiller Flexner LLP ("BSF"), we understand it t

a New York Times article dated November 30, 2019 concerning Jeffrey Epstein and alleged videos, and Episode 22 of The Weekly, a television series of the New York Times, concerning the same. In your letter, you cite Federal Rule of Evidence 16(a)(1)(E)(i), the Due Process Clause, Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83

Bannon nixed Cohn’s plan to expand the National Economic Council by as many as thirty people. (Kushner, not to be denied, nixed Bannon’s plan to have David Bossie build and lead his staff.) Bannon also retailed the likely not-too-far-off-the-mark view (or, anyway, a popular view inside Goldman Sachs) that Cohn,

rs—Evan Osnos, David Remnick, and Joshua Yaffa HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019998 —attributing Russian aggressiveness to a new cold war. Remnick, the editor of the New Yorker, had, since the Trump election, propounded an absolutist view that Trump’s election imperiled Democratic norms. This 13,500-word story—handily conne

night included Chelsea Han- dler, George Stephanopoulos, Charlie Rose, Katie Couric, and Woody Allen. At around the same time, Jeffrey Epstein told the New York Post, “I’m not a sexual predator, I’m an ‘offender’ It’s the differ- ence between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel.” Was it so remarkable t

Jeffrey Epstein while he was receiving oral sex from Virginia Roberts, which she swore to under oath, is so outra- geous, so preposterous, that even David Boies [a prominent lawyer associated with the firm representing Virginia Rob- erts] said he couldn't believe it was true. ebecca says Virginia had previ-

so outra- geous, so preposterous, that even David Boies [a prominent lawyer associated with the firm rep