Epstein Secrets

ix. 0911212019 3241 CONFliteINTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM_00331640 EFTA 00204366 EFTA02729352 motion of any party (A-7:40). Federal Court Judge Marra has twice denied public access to these documents. Mr. Epstein seeks certiorari review on an emergency basis.2 The court stayed disclo

le 2.420(d) (titled, "Request to Make Circuit and County Court Records in Non-Criminal Cases Confidential") do not apply to criminal cases. See Ha. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420, 2007 Court Commentary ("New subdivision (d) applies to motions that seek to make court records in 09/1212019 Wge 3251 CONFIDENTIAL

hasis is supplied unless indicated otherwise. The following symbol is used: A — Petitioner's appendix. EFTA00231148 motion of any party (A-7:40). Federal Court Judge Marra has twice denied public access to these documents. Mr. Epstein seeks certiorari review on an emergency basis.2 The court stayed disclo

d, "Request to Make Circuit and County Court Records in Non-Criminal Cases 9 EFTA00231141 Confidential") do not apply to criminal cases. See Ha. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420, 2007 Court Commentary ("New. subdivision (d) applies to motions that seek to make court records in non-criminal cases confidential i

is is supplied unless indicated otherwise. The following symbol is used: A — Petitioner's appendix. 1 EFTA00232268 motion of any party (A-7:40). Federal Court Judge Marra has twice denied public access to these documents. Mr. Epstein seeks certiorari review on an emergency basis.2 The court stayed disclo

les of judicial administration provided that court records "shall be confidential" if a court has determined that confidentiality is required. Ha. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420(c)(9). Rule 2.420(c)(9) provides: —0)-Exemptionsr-The following records of the judicial branch shall be confidential: (9) Any court

h apparently he has, which is that the 21 $50,000 or $150,000 floor under 2255 also would be a cap. That 22 if they were to proceed to file suit in Federal Court to get 23 fair damages under 2255, Mr. Epstein would admit liability, but 24 he, of course, could fight the damages portion, which means 25 that,

isclosure of matters protected by a common law or privacy right not generally inherent in the specific type of proceeding sought to be closed." Ha. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420(c)(9)(A)(vi) (emphasis added). Epstein argues disclosure of a plea agreement is not generally inherent in a state court plea hearing