Epstein Secrets

ix. 0911212019 3241 CONFliteINTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM_00331640 EFTA 00204366 EFTA02729352 motion of any party (A-7:40). Federal Court Judge Marra has twice denied public access to these documents. Mr. Epstein seeks certiorari review on an emergency basis.2 The court stayed disclo

6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See e.g. Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court can, absent findings, order the unsealing of federal

hasis is supplied unless indicated otherwise. The following symbol is used: A — Petitioner's appendix. EFTA00180654 motion of any party (A-7:40). Federal Court Judge Marra has twice denied public access to these documents. Mr. Epstein seeks certiorari review on an emergency basis.2 The court stayed disclo

e 6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See e.g. Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court can, absent findings, order the unsealing of federal

hasis is supplied unless indicated otherwise. The following symbol is used: A — Petitioner's appendix. EFTA00231148 motion of any party (A-7:40). Federal Court Judge Marra has twice denied public access to these documents. Mr. Epstein seeks certiorari review on an emergency basis.2 The court stayed disclo

e 6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See e.g. Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court can, absent findings, order the unsealing of federal

is is supplied unless indicated otherwise. The following symbol is used: A — Petitioner's appendix. 1 EFTA00232268 motion of any party (A-7:40). Federal Court Judge Marra has twice denied public access to these documents. Mr. Epstein seeks certiorari review on an emergency basis.2 The court stayed disclo

e 6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See e.g. Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court can, absent findings, order the unsealing of federal