Epstein Secrets

3d ed. North Carolina Academic Press 2010). He has also litigated crime victims' rights matters before federal courts around the country, including the United States Supreme Court. See, e.g., Parable v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 1710 (2014) (arguing before the Supreme Court on behalf of "Amy," a child pornography victim seeki

504 Ellen Brockman Boles, Schiller & Flexner LLP 575 Lexington Ave New York, New York 10022 (212) 446-2300 Paul Cassell (Seeking Pro Hac Vice) S.J. Quinney College of Law, University of Utah 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 (801) 858-5202 [email protected] Bradley J. Edwards (Seeking Pro Hac

tially determined who was going to be President of the most powerful country in the world. There were two attorneys who argued that case in front of the United States Supreme Court, and arguing for the Democratic Presidential Candidate, Al Gore, was David Boies. He had put his credibility on the line in arguing the Bush versus

Florida 33301 Telephone (954) 524-2820 Facsimile (954) 524-2822 E-mail: [email protected] And Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice Motion Pending S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 383 S. University St. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone:801-585-5202 Facsimile:801-585-6833 E-Mail:[email protected].

o the Federal Rules o Criminal Procedure 2007 Reporter 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861 * Length: 59852 words Author: Paul G. Cassell* * Professor of Law, S.J. Quinney College of Law of the University of Utah, Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, 2002-07. Thanks to Sara Sun Beale, Doug Beloof, Doug Berman, Russell

interests of the victim. 774 Having seen the Advisory Committee proposal and accompanying note, I am concerned that the limits on subpoenas found in the United States Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Nixon 734 might be vitiated by a broad rule. To ensure courts consistently apply Nixon's substantive and procedural stan