Epstein Secrets

2009 FILED CLERK'S OFFICE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION GENERAL ORDER AMENDING FILING DEADLINES On March 26, 2009, the United States Supreme Court approved revisions to federal court procedural rules, inter alia, changing the method by which time is calculated in the federal courts to multiple

F JOHN K DEMA PC 1236 Strand Street Suite 103 St. Croix, VI 00820-5008 William B. Federman FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD 10205 North Pennsylvania Avenue Oklahoma City, OK 73120 Jill Goldberg SCHULTE ROTH & ZABEL LLP 919 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 MDL No. 1963 Brad S. Karp PAUL WEISS RIFICIND WHARTON &

7. Corte 4w4$9(2) The state courts are the final arbiters of the meaning and appropriate application of state statutes, subject only to review by the United States Supreme Court if such construction or application is appropriately challenged on constitutional grounds. & Coons itio508(7) Interference with the process of th

. § 876, which falls squarely within guideline 2A6.I. We have, however, already rejected precisely this argument in Nichols.There, the jury in the Oklahoma City bombing trial acquitted Terry Nichols on counts of first and second degree murder, but the district court sentenced him for his crime of con

his point is heightened by pre-CVRA caselaw questioning any right by a victim's representative to assert victims' rights. Most notably, in one of the Oklahoma City bombing prosecutions, the Tenth Circuit rebuked a trial judge for permitting an attorney for the bombing victims to participate in oral argument at a

interests of the victim. 774 Having seen the Advisory Committee proposal and accompanying note, I am concerned that the limits on subpoenas found in the United States Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Nixon 734 might be vitiated by a broad rule. To ensure courts consistently apply Nixon's substantive and procedural stan