Epstein Secrets

ealing such documents. After hearing argument of counsel, the Court makes the following findings and rulings: 1) Neither the State of Florida nor the U.S. Government nor Mr. Epstein have presented sufficient evidence to warrant the sealing of documents currently held by the Court. 2) The Motions to seal the Co

9 So.2d 389, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D2439 (Cite as: 769 So.2d 389) custody proceeding are not considered as "necessary parties" to the action. See Shienvold v. Habit:, 622 So.2d 538 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). There- fore, it is manifestly obvious that the minor chil- dren in this case are not "parties" to this

sealing such documents. After hearing argument of counsel, the Court makes the following findings and rulings: 1) Neither the State of Florida nor the U.S. Government nor Mr. Epstein have presented sufficient evidence to warrant the sealing of documents currently held by the Court. 2) The Motions to_seal the

9 769 .2d 389d4 Fla. L. Weekly D2439 (Cite as: 769 M.2d 389) custody proceeding are not considered as "necessary arties" to the action. See Shienvold v. liable, 622 e2d 538 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). There- fore, it is manifestly obvious that the minor chil- dren in this case are not "parties" to this p

ealing such documents. After hearing argument of counsel, the Court makes the following findings and rulings: 1) Neither the State of Florida nor the U.S. Government nor Mr. Epstein have presented sufficient evidence to warrant the sealing of documents currently held by the Court. 2) The Motions taseal thet

9 So.2d 389, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D2439 (Cite as: 769 So.2d 389) custody proceeding are not considered as "necessary parties" to the action. See Shienvold v. liable. 622 So.2d 538 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). There- fore, it is manifestly obvious that the minor chil- dren in this case are not "parties" to this