Epstein Secrets

June 11, 2009 motion (A-13). Epstein's counsel consented to that procedure. (A-18 at p. 9, Il. 16 -18.) The Judge held that neither the State, nor the U.S. Government, nor Epstein had shown why the NPA ought to remain confidential and ordered the records unsealed.9 (A-16.) 9 It is important to note that the Stat

Hearing, or a Proper Order 11 2. Closure of the Addendum Improperly Occurred without any Procedures to Protect the Right of Access at all. 12 B. No Basis Exists for Current Closure of the Non-prosecution Agreement or Its Addendum. 13 1. Petitioner Cannot Identify a Rule 2.420(cX9) Interest that Warrants Closure. 16 2. The Fede

s June 11, 2009 motion (A-13). Epstein's counsel consented to that procedure. (A-18 at p. 9,11. 16 -18.) The Judge held that neither the State, nor the U.S. Government, nor Epstein had shown why the NPA ought to remain confidential and ordered the records unsealed.9 (A-16.) It is important to note that the State

Hearing, or a Proper Order. 11 2. Closure of the Addendum Improperly Occurred without any Procedures to Protect the Right of Access at all 12 B. No Basis Exists for Current Closure of the Non-prosecution Agreement or Its Addendum 13 1. Petitioner Cannot Identify a Rule 2.420(cX9) Interest that Warrants Closure. 16 2. The Federal

s June 11, 2009 motion (A-13). Epstein's counsel consented to that procedure. (A-18 at p. 9,11. 16 -18.) The Judge held that neither the State, nor the U.S. Government, nor Epstein had shown why the NPA ought to remain confidential and ordered the records unsealed.9 (A-16.) 9 It is important to note that the Stat

Hearing, or a Proper Order. 11 2. Closure of the Addendum Improperly Occurred without any Procedures to Protect the Right of Access at all. 12 B. No Basis Exists for Current Closure of the Non-prosecution Agreement or Its Addendum. 13 1. Petitioner Cannot Identify a Rule 2.420(cX9) Interest that Warrants Closure. 16 2. The Federal