Epstein Secrets

sealing such documents. After hearing argument of counsel, the Court makes the following findings and rulings: 1) Neither the State of Florida nor the U.S. Government nor Mr. Epstein have presented sufficient evidence to warrant the sealing of documents currently held by the Court. 2) The Motions to seal the Co

m, you shall be placed on Pr4 lion or a period of under the supervision of the Department of Corrections, subject to Florida law. l or--7‘d in the County Jail of a term of $IX (61 MONTHS AS TO COUNT I FOLLOWED BY TWELVE (12) MONTHS COMMUNITY CONTROL I CONSECUTIVE TO THE (121 MONTH SENTENCE IN CASE# 2008C

of the protective order barring them from publicly disclosing or discussing the terms of the non-prosecution agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and the United States Government. Jeffrey Epstein has made no response to this motion. The Government, however, contends that the victims' motion should be denied because the victim

ou that! be pladed on Probation fora peeled of node- the ropervistor: of the Department of Corrottioni, subject it Florida law. or ccaSned In the County Jail fora tern of 8tX/61 MO! COMMUNITY CONTRQL I CONSECUTIVE TO THE flEt MONTE SENTENCE rat, CASES 2008C10094SAAMB with credit torPTE OD Wet Jail time,

s June 11, 2009 motion (A-13). Epstein's counsel consented to that procedure. (A-18 at p. 9,11. 16 -18.) The Judge held that neither the State, nor the U.S. Government, nor Epstein had shown why the NPA ought to remain confidential and ordered the records unsealed.9 (A-16.) 9 It is important to note that the Stat

G PORTION OF SUPERVISION SENTENCE It is hereby ordered sad adjudged that you be: committed to the Department of Corrections or K confined in the County Jail fora kern of with credit for jail time. After you haw mewed of the tens, you shall be placed on Probation for a period of under time supervisio