Epstein Secrets

size of his genitalia; (4) In Jane Doe 2, Edwards represented in pleading to the federal Magistrate that records of communications by and between the United States Government and Epstein's criminal defense lawyers in the plea negotiations of the criminal matters were likely to lead to relevant information in the Jane Doe

community control. 21. An assistant U.S. Attorney handling the hearing in federal court relating to the NPA, represented that it was not intent of the United States Government nor was the NPA designed to "hand them [the alleged Epstein victims] a jack pot or a key to the bank." 22. Notwithstanding the agreement reached b

se in midst of the collapse of a firm in which he was a member, called Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. ("RRA"). 4. Rothstein was disbarred by the Florida Supreme Court on November 20, 2009. Subsequently, Rothstein was arrested, arraigned in federal court, pled guilty and ultimately was sentenced to fifty (50) year

gain prior to the - let me start again. EXHIBIT "A" 2 EFTA00606648 Prior to the filing of the lawsuit against Jane Doc 1 and Jane Doe 2 against the United States Government, did you learn from any source, maybe a document, maybe a telephone call or a conversation that you had with a third party separate from your clien

ranscript at 50, 54, 91, 100-104, 114, 126,-127, 155, 170, 181, 184-187, 192, 198-202, 205-206, 208-210, 212, 215-217; Exhibit 1. Forty years ago, the Florida Supreme Court, in Surf Drugs, Inc. v. Vermette, 236 So. 2d 108, 112 (Fla. 1970), gave this general definition of work product saying what it is and what it is no

June 11, 2009 motion (A-13). Epstein's counsel consented to that procedure. (A-18 at p. 9, Il. 16 -18.) The Judge held that neither the State, nor the U.S. Government, nor Epstein had shown why the NPA ought to remain confidential and ordered the records unsealed.9 (A-16.) 9 It is important to note that the Stat

Administration 2.051, now 2.420, which was applicable in both criminal and civil cases. Sarasota-Herald Tribune, 924 So. 2d at 11. In April 2007, the Florida Supreme Court adopted emergency amendments to Rule 2.420 in response to Florida media reports of hidden cases and secret dockets, a process that has come to be k

s June 11, 2009 motion (A-13). Epstein's counsel consented to that procedure. (A-18 at p. 9,11. 16 -18.) The Judge held that neither the State, nor the U.S. Government, nor Epstein had shown why the NPA ought to remain confidential and ordered the records unsealed.9 (A-16.) It is important to note that the State

Administration 2.051, now 2.420, which was applicable in both criminal and civil cases. Sarasota-Herald Tribune, 924 So. 2d at 11. In April 2007, the Florida Supreme Court adopted emergency amendments to Rule 2.420 in response to Florida media reports of hidden cases and secret dockets, a process that has come to be k

s June 11, 2009 motion (A-13). Epstein's counsel consented to that procedure. (A-18 at p. 9,11. 16 -18.) The Judge held that neither the State, nor the U.S. Government, nor Epstein had shown why the NPA ought to remain confidential and ordered the records unsealed.9 (A-16.) 9 It is important to note that the Stat

Administration 2.051, now 2.420, which was applicable in both criminal and civil cases. Sarasota-Herald Tribune, 924 So. 2d at 11. In April 2007, the Florida Supreme Court adopted emergency amendments to Rule 2.420 in response to Florida media reports of hidden cases and secret dockets, a process that has come to be k